Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 23, 1998 <br />( #2411 Paul Hanssen, continued) <br />brought up to code, which requires certain variances. Jabbour commented that a hardship must be <br />found in order to grant the variances. <br />Hanssen commented the wind storm in May had blown the deck off the boathouse, and upon <br />closer inspection, it was determined that the foundation is in disrepair, but in his opinion the <br />boathouse could have been used for another ten years. <br />Goetten indicated she was still somewhat confused about the ordinance, noting that in her view <br />the value of the structure played a factor in determining whether the improvements could be made <br />to the structure. <br />Hanssen stated the ordinance states that the value of the building is determined at the time of <br />the loss and not at the time the ordinance was adopted. <br />Barrett indicated he did not receive the letter from City Staff until after the Planning Commission <br />meeting and at the previous City Council meeting was not familiar enough with the case to give clear <br />direction on how to proceed on this application. Barrett stated the location of the boathouse makes <br />it non - conforming due to the setback and is not a non - conforming use. The City Council needs to <br />decide whether a variance should be granted to allow this type of non - conforming structure to <br />remain. Barrett stated the value of the structure has been looked at in previous applications in <br />determining hardship. <br />Barrett stated the variance is properly before the City Council and the City Council needs to make a <br />determination based on hardship on whether to grant the variances. <br />• Mayor Jabbour stated in his view the City Council needs to determine whether that structure would <br />have had a longer life span had the damage not occurred in the windstorm. Jabbour commented he <br />was attempting to differentiate what percentage of the repairs are necessary due to bringing the <br />structure up to code versus what damage was caused in the storm. <br />Kelley remarked that the Building Inspector must think that more than 50 percent of the structure <br />needs to be replaced, noting that the ordinances are pretty clear. <br />Flint stated he has difficulty making the Applicant tear down what was pre- existing. Flint commented <br />that numerous residents in the Casco Point area have expressed complaints regarding the costs <br />associated with obtaining the required structural engineering plans and other studies that the City <br />requests. Flint stated that maybe that issue should be reviewed to see if some of these costs can <br />be avoided. <br />Mayor Jabbour indicated that a hardship must be demonstrated. <br />Flint stated in his opinion the hardship is that the boathouse was pre- existing, the windstorm <br />damaged the structure, and the Applicant is now requesting to repair what he already had. <br />Mayor Jabbour remarked that the required engineering plans and studies are needed to determine <br />the full extent of the project before work is commenced, and that City Staff attempts to use common <br />sense when requesting these studies. <br />Hanssen indicated that the engineering plan fee was not a big issue in his mind. <br />Mayor Jabbour commented that the difference in this application and other applications is that this <br />application has become necessary due to the damage caused in the storm. Jabbour noted that the <br />City in the past has taken the position that non - conforming structures should not be allowed to stay <br />Page 9 <br />