My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-26-1998 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
10-26-1998 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2012 1:27:59 PM
Creation date
9/27/2012 1:27:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 26, 1998 <br />• (Little Orchard, Continued) <br />Gaffron stated a potential buyer for Lot 5 has pursued the premise that the boundary of the <br />protected area is wrongly located and should be moved closer to the lakeshore. The <br />Applicant is suggesting that newer, more accurate topography information is available which <br />results in the top of the bluff being located from ten feet to as much as forty feet nearer the <br />shore than depicted in the easement description. <br />Staff suggested that the builder have a new topographic survey created for site planning <br />purposes to more accurately establish house placement, which has been completed. After a <br />review of the newly submitted information, Staff has determined that the new analysis does <br />yield a top of bluff setback line ranging from five feet to nearly forty -five feet nearer the lake <br />than the current easement line. Staff is looking to preserve trees, vegetation, slope and natural <br />topography with the easement. <br />Staff recommends approval of Staffs revised easement description as depicted in Exhibit C, <br />which is more accurate than the current description. <br />Dan Anderson stated it is their goal to leave the natural topography of the land intact as much <br />as possible, noting they would like to construct a residence on top of the knoll which is an <br />ideal spot for a house and follows the natural contour of the land. Anderson stated they are <br />attempting to keep the houses within the height restrictions as well. <br />Kyle Hunt, Builder, stated the new topographic information shows the top of bluff setback in <br />a slightly different location as the previous one, and requested the City Council consider the <br />new information and allow for a new top of bluff setback. Hunt commented it is their <br />intention to work as much as possible with the natural contours of the land and to avoid the <br />need for extensive excavation. <br />Mayor Jabbour inquired why Gaffron changed the top of bluff line. <br />G.-`1'ron stated with the new topographic information available, it depicted slopes that exceed <br />10' percent, which changed the top of bluff line. <br />Ted Kemna, Schoell & Madson, stated he has spent time working with Gaffron to understand <br />the top of bluff ordinance. Kemna stated their goals were to keep the height of the house <br />down as much as possible and as close to the lake which will provide a better driveway access <br />coming in off the street. Kemna stated they are planning a circle drive for this property. <br />Kemna remarked the difference between Gaffron's top of bluff line and his amounts to <br />approximately a foot difference in elevation and four or five feet difference from the lake, <br />which will allow the walkout to sit in more closely with the natural contours of the land. <br />Dan Anderson commented the four to five feet distance adds no value to the residence but <br />• would aid in their efforts to keep the height elevation of the residence lower. <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.