Laserfiche WebLink
� �__- � <br /> � o� � <br /> , o 0 <br /> '' ��- - '' CITY of ORONU <br /> ' r'� ,.,); <br /> i � .. <br /> �� � ��;'�� , �,��� �4��� MunicipalOffices <br /> �',� � l -:, . �a., �'ti/� <br /> ,� '��'��������;,�_;`�,�-�.� Street Address: Mailing Address: <br /> `9$EggOg' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 <br /> �— Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 <br /> April 8, 1998 <br /> Andrew J. Goetten <br /> 1385 Fox Street <br /> Wayzata, MN 55391 <br /> Re: Blue Hill - Special Lot Combination Agreement <br /> Dear Andrew: <br /> Thank you for your letter of March 18 requesting clarification of the'no accessory parking'condition <br /> of the Special Lot Combination Agreement for Lot l, Block 1 and Outlot A of Blue Hill. <br /> I have reviewed this with Ron Moorse and have also reviewed the staff inemos and Council meeting <br /> minutes pertinent to the Agreement. I found no documented specific discussion of the condition that <br /> 'Parcel B (Outlot A) shall not serve as an accessory parking area'. <br /> Similar conditions have been established for similar special lot combinations in Orono, where a <br /> small lakeshore parcel is separated by a road from the residence parcel to which it is accessory. In <br /> one case on Bayside Road, where such a lakeshore parcel was visually very'open'with perhaps only <br /> 20-30' of land between the road and the lakeshore, it was clearly intended and stated that no <br /> temporary or permanent vehicular parking would be allowed. Two obvious justifications for such <br /> a requirement were that a)parking within 75' of the lake would not be in keeping with the hardcover <br /> ordinances; and b) any vehicles parked on the parcel would be a visual detriment to views of the <br /> lake from the road. A third justification for such a condition is that property security cannot be as <br /> easily maintained by the resident when the residence is separated from the outlot by not only a <br /> roadway but by a significant distance. <br /> The first two justifications noted above might be less applicable in your case given that a significant <br /> portion of the outlot is further than 75' from the lake, and given that a vehicle might potentially be <br /> screened from view of the general public by existing vegetation and topography. However,the third <br /> justification is very applicable given the distance between your residence parcel and the outlot, and <br /> the nature of the busy roadway separating them. <br /> Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 <br />