Laserfiche WebLink
Blue Hill Special Lot Combination <br /> November 20, 1998 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Item 8 on page 3 notes that the "terms and conditions of this indenture may be modified, amended <br /> or extinguished...". The applicant is requesting a minor modification of the Agreement to allow far <br /> temporary vehicle parking on Outlot A. <br /> Why Limit Parking? <br /> Earlier this year I reviewed the staff inemos and Council meeting minutes pertinent to the <br /> Agreement. I found no documented specific discussion to clarify the reasoning behind including the <br /> condition that 'Outlot A shall not serve as an accessory parking area'. <br /> Similar conditions have been established for similar special lot combinations in Orono, where a <br /> small lakeshore parcel is separated by a road from the residence parcel to which it is accessory. In <br /> one case on Bayside Road, where such a lakeshore parcel was visually very 'open' with perhaps only <br /> 20-30' of land between the road and the lakeshore, it was clearly intended and stated that no <br /> temporary or permanent vehicular parking would be allowed. <br /> Two obvious justifications for such a requirement were that a) parking within 75' of the lake would <br /> not be in keeping with the hardcover ordinances; and b) any vehicles parked on the parcel would <br /> be a visual detriment to views of the lake from the road. A third justification for such a condition <br /> is that property security cannot be as easily maintained by the resident when the residence is <br /> separated from the outlot by not only a roadway but by a significant distance. <br /> The first two justifications noted above may be less applicable in the case of Blue Hill Outlot A <br /> given that a significant portion of the Outlot is further than 75' from the lake, and given that a vehicle <br /> might potentially be screened from view of the general public by existing vegetation and topography. <br /> However, the third justification is very applicable given the distance between the residence parcel <br /> and the Outlot, and the nature of the busy roadway separating them. <br /> Zoning Code Parking Standards <br /> The zoning code provides some direction regarding standards for parking areas that may be pertinent <br /> to this discussion. Section 10.61 Subd. SA indicates that "vehicles normally owned or kept by the <br /> occupants on the premises must have a garage stall or open parking space on the same lot as the <br /> principal use served"; since Outlot A and Lot 1 have been legally combined into a single tax parcel, <br /> an argument can be made that parking on Outlot A would not be in conflict with this section. Subd. <br /> SA also states that "open parking spaces on lots must have a location other than a required yard <br /> except that such parking may be located in a rear yard to within ten feet of an interior side lot line <br /> and to within ten feet of a rear lot line". Since a lakeshore lot has by definition a lakeshore yard and <br /> a rear yard, one can infer that open parking on a lakeshore lot would normally have to occur at least <br /> 10' back from the street lot line. <br />