Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR AUGUST 10, 1998 <br />( #12) REPORT REGARDING IMPACTS OF RIGHT- OF- WA YACQUISITION FOR NEW <br />HIGHWAY 12 ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS -continued <br />Moorse commented that Mn/DOT would agree to a total taking if the lots would still be considered <br />buildable because they don't want to lose the entire value of the house. Jabbour noted this would <br />leave the lot legally non - conforming. <br />Kelley commented that a total taking would be the best solution for the residents. This would give <br />the homeowner an option. Jabbour added that if a primary and alternate septic site was not available, <br />the property would have to be combined with an adjacent property to be considered buildable. <br />Mayor Jabbour indicated that if the City pursued a sewer line, it would be at the City's expense with <br />no help from Mn/DOT. <br />Kelley questioned how small a lot could be before it would be considered unbuildable. Goetten <br />agreed that a primary and alternate septic site would need to be available, as well as other typical <br />requirements such as a well. Lots could vary in size and still meet many of the required building <br />standards. Council was reluctant to set a minimum lot size (such as under 1 acre) that would be <br />considered non - conforming and unbuildable. • <br />Mayor Jabbour stated that Mn/DOT should be informed that any lot less than 2 acres would be <br />considered non - conforming, and every lot must have a primary and alternate septic site. Gaffron <br />agreed with Council comments. He also felt each lot would need to be reviewed separately for <br />buildability. <br />Mayor Jabbour asked about the status of requests by Orono property owners for hardship <br />acquisitions. Moorse responded that a letter had been sent to Mn/DOT identifying several properties <br />interested in hardship acquisitions. <br />( * #13) LICENSES <br />There were no licenses. <br />( * #14) BILLS <br />Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Vote: Ayes <br />3, Nays 0. <br />16 • <br />