Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JULY 27,1998 <br />( #3) KELLY COVE JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE -SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING <br />7:30 P.M. - 8:58 P.M. - continued <br />Goetten indicated she would deny the current proposal, but would be open to some type of <br />agreement that would limit the total number of boats to 6. She also questioned how Lot 3 was to <br />be developed. Jabbour responded that if Lot 3 was developed as a single family residence, the <br />LMCD would allow 4 slips without City approval. <br />Sheridan noted that Hoyt took down an unsightly structure and removed an oil tank from the <br />City's right-of-way- <br />Jabbour suggested tabling the application until the plans for Lot 3 have been determined. <br />Sheridan asked if the Council was waiting for a proposal from Mr. Hoyt. Jabbour responded that <br />he would like to see a comprehensive plan for the property; including the number of boats and <br />the mechanism that would be used to control that number, the location of docks for Lot 3 and the <br />dock location for the duplex units. <br />Sheridan stated that Mr. Hoyt would not come to the City and restrict his rights from what he is . <br />legally allowed to do on the property. Jabbour responded that the City had no intention to take <br />away any rights. <br />Goetten questioned the 60 day rule. Gaffron responded that the application was not a zoning <br />application but a license application under Chapter 5 of the City Code. <br />Barrett stated that a reading of the subdivision and conditional use permit conditions would be <br />considered zoning issues. Since the license application is not requesting any changes to the <br />subdivision or conditional use permit, Council could deny the license if it found the application <br />inconsistent with the plat and conditional use permit. Council could also extend the time. <br />Barrett commented that the decision to extend the time on the application would be made by the <br />Kelly Cove Homeowner's Association and not Sheridan. <br />Kelley indicated he would prefer to reaffirm the resolution of 1979. <br />Barrett suggested a denial resolution be drafted if Council decided to deny the application. He <br />did not think the application was governed by the 60 day rule as it is not a zoning application. It <br />appears the 60 days would be met if the application were considered at the August 10 meeting if <br />this did become an issue. <br />8 0 <br />