Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JULY 27,1998 <br />( #3) KELLY COVE JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE - SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING <br />7.30 P.M. - 8:58 P.M. - continued <br />Barrett indicated that the City has two laws governing the docks. The City has the right to grant <br />a joint use dock license if the LMCD standards are met, and the conditions of the conditional use <br />permit were established with the subdivision. Gaffron added that Resolution No. 892 was <br />adopted in 1978 granting a joint use dock license. The resolution approving the subdivision and <br />conditional use permit required that the docks be located on Outlot A. <br />Kelley reiterated that the duplex owners would be in a position to lose their lake rights if they <br />agree to sell Outlot A. <br />Sheridan asked what effect the 1984 replat had on the conditional use permit. He felt the City <br />was denying the property owner the right to the highest and best use of his property by not <br />allowing Outlot A to be combined with Lot 3. Jabbour responded that the City must abide by <br />their ordinances. <br />0 <br />Goetten asked in what capacity Sheridan was representing Mr. Hoyt. Sheridan responded that he <br />was Mr. Hoyt's attorney. • <br />Sheridan responded to an earlier question about the development of Hoyt's lot. He was unable to <br />confirm if single family or duplex development was planned for Hoyt's lot. <br />Van Zomeren confirmed that a recent application approved a conditional use permit for duplex <br />use on Lot 3. A code amendment was also adopted regarding duplex use. <br />Sheridan commented that Mr. Hoyt wants to have an option to develop Lot 3 as a single family <br />residence, and an outlot at the shoreline would not be desirable. Jabbour felt that Hoyt's request <br />was financially motivated, and he was aware of the outlot when the property was purchased. <br />Sheridan noted that the City's concern was that 2 more slips would be allowed by the LMCD if <br />Lot 3 was developed as a single family residence for a net increase of 2 slips. Jabbour responded <br />that his goal was not to exceed the number of slips that currently exists and uphold a previous <br />Council's decision to limit the properties to 6 slips. Jabbour confirmed that a jet ski is considered <br />a boat. <br />Kupfer noted that there are no wetlands today. Gaffron explained that the wetland easement still <br />exists although dredging has changed the wetland from its original state. <br />0 <br />I] <br />