Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 22,1998 <br />( #6) 2364 John Serena, 4607 Watertown Road - continued <br />Van Zomeren reported ten acres are necessary, with an addition to the findings that the zoning codes <br />allow accessory structures where there isn't a density requirement. This structure is classified as a <br />pool house, but is listed on the conditional use permit application form as a guest house. <br />Mayor Jabbour suggested the term guest house be deleted to avoid confusion and classify <br />it as an accessory structure. Goetten noted she did not have a problem with deletion of the term <br />guest house. <br />Van Zomeren stated she will amend the resolution to reflect that change. <br />Goetten moved, Flint seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4100, A Resolution Granting <br />a Conditional Use Permit for John and Joan Serena, 4607 Watertown Road, with the <br />resolution being amended to reflect pool house instead of guest house. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />0 <br />( #7) 2383 CHRISTINE AND GARY VALERIUS, 3750 BAYSIDE ROAD PRELIMINARY <br />CLASS II SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION NO. 4101 . <br />Christine and Gary Valerius were present. <br />Van Zomeren stated this application is proposing a two lot division that includes creating one new <br />lot, with a wetland credit and lot width variance being required for Lot 1. City Council <br />reviewed the sketch plan previously. The property is zoned LR -lA in the front portion of the <br />property with the remainder being located in the RR -lA zoning district, but for purposes of this <br />subdivision, only the LR -lA requirements apply. The property consists of 4.51 total <br />acres, with 3.31 acres dry buildable and 1.2 acres in wetland. <br />The Applicants are proposing to create a new building site on Lot 1, which meets all of the <br />LR -lA zoning requirements with the exception of the lot width requirement. The surveyor <br />calculated the lot width at the 50' setback without the easement to be 151' and with the driveway <br />easement to be 181'. A variance is needed because 200' is not available at the front property line nor <br />the 50' front setback line. <br />The Planning Commission did recommend that the lot width variance be granted as well as a wetland <br />credit. <br />• <br />