Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 8,1998 i <br />B. RESCHEDULE ASSESSMENT HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 4090 <br />Peterson moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4090, rescheduling the public hearing <br />on the proposed assessment for the Shoreline/Heritage sanitary sewer project to June 29, 1998 at <br />7:00 p.m. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Kelley questioned why the hearing was scheduled for June 29, 1998 at a special meeting instead of <br />at the regular June 22 meeting. Jabbour responded that the June 22 meeting would not meet the <br />publication requirements. Gappa added that the City would like to award the contract before July <br />so would like to reschedule the hearing earlier than the regular meeting of July 13. Jabbour <br />suggested a joint work session with Planning Commission prior to the public hearing. <br />( #2) SAGA HILL PARK ACCESS INFORMATION MEETING <br />Jabbour explained the purpose of the meeting was to discuss acquiring access to the park. He gave <br />a brief history of the project. The neighbors requested that the City acquire a tax forfeit parcel in the <br />area for a park. At the same time, there were several parcels of land for sale that the neighbors felt <br />they could acquire by fund raising and potential grants from the DNR. Several months later, Mayor <br />Jabbour and Park Commissioner McMillan met with the neighbors to explain the status of the • <br />project. As a result of the meeting, the City actively pursued the purchase of the tax forfeit property <br />and acquired it from Hennepin County. At the time the City Council decided to move ahead to <br />acquire the tax forfeit parcel, the Council made it clear that the property could be used in a more <br />active way than a natural area. The neighbors then successfully raised two - thirds of the cost of the <br />other parcels, and these were acquired also. There were deed restrictions on the parcels acquired <br />with the DNR grant, which three of the Council Members were concerned about. <br />The neighbors recently asked the City to endorse a second grant request from the DNR. A condition <br />of that grant request was that access to the park be resolved. Mayor Jabbour and Council Member <br />Flint have met with members of the Church to discuss access issues. The City felt a good option for <br />park access was through the Church property. However, the Church does not want to be put in a <br />position which would conflict with any of the neighbors. <br />Moorse presented several alternatives for accessing the park. <br />1. Construct a road that uses the Garden Lane right -of -way, with a parking lot on the <br />park property. Advantages are that a public right -of -way would be used and the <br />parking lot would be placed on existing public land. Disadvantages include <br />construction of an expensive roadway that would change the character of the area; <br />it could encourage development that may not happen without the City building the <br />roadway. Also, existing park land would be used for a parking lot. The estimated <br />cost of the roadway is $100,000. . <br />P <br />