Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR MAY 26, 1998 • <br />( #9) #2358 Randy & Marie Staffanson, 1422 Park Drive - Variance - continued <br />Mrs. Staffanson stated they were still working with builders to see if they could finance the <br />attached garage as approved in the original variance application. If they can't work out <br />financing, they would like to rebuild the garage in its previous location. They would like to have <br />approval to build whichever garage they receive financing for. <br />Van Zomeren explained the changes in the current proposal. Less hardcover is proposed but <br />there is a greater encroachment on the side yard setback. <br />Kelley asked when the applicants would be able to make a decision about which plan to use. <br />Mrs. Staffanson replied that they were meeting with the builder on Thursday. <br />Kelley suggested tabling the application. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Jabbour stated that Council could not approve an open -ended situation. He requested that they <br />appear before Council again if they want to rebuild the garage in its previous location. Notice <br />would need to be given to the neighbors 10 days prior to the meeting. is <br />Council confirmed that if the attached garage was to be built, the applicants would not have to <br />reappear before Council as the variances were already granted. <br />Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to table Application #2358 for reconsideration of a variance <br />for the property located at 1422 Park Drive. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />( #10) #2363 WILLIAM H. BOCKMANN, 1130 LOMA LINDA AVENUE - VARIANCES <br />Mr. and Mrs. Bockmann and their son were present. <br />Van Zomeren explained that the applicant is asking for variances to tear down the existing <br />residence and rebuild. Variances are required for lot area, average lakeshore setback, hardcover <br />in the 75 -250' zone and a side yard setback. Planning Commission has considered the proposal <br />twice and recommend approval of the current plan on a vote of 5 to 0. They noted that the <br />applicant intends to care for an elderly relative in the home. The amount of excess hardcover <br />is approximately 403 s.f. The proposed bedroom/closet/hall for the elderly relative is <br />approximately 300 s.£, which is very close to the extra hardcover. <br />0 <br />C <br />