Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR MAY 26, 1998 <br />( * 914) #2374 Busse Construction on Behalf of. - continued <br />C. ROBERT & JULIE HANNING, 4220 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - <br />RESOLUTION NO. 4086 <br />Kelley moved, Flint seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4086 granting a <br />conditional use permit for enlargement of a berm on the property owned by Robert <br />and Julie Hanning located at 4220 Sixth Avenue North. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />D. BUSSE CONSTRUCTION, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ORONO, <br />McCULLEY ROAD PARKING LOT NORTH OF THE LUCE LINE TRAIL <br />- RESOLUTION NO. 4087 <br />Kelley moved, Flint seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4087 granting a <br />conditional use permit to raise the parking lot by adding fill on the property <br />owned by the City of Orono located at the McCulley Road parking lot north of <br />the Luce Line Trail. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />( #15) #2375 PARK LAND CO., 2525/34/45 SHADYWOOD ROAD - SKETCH PLAN <br />• The applicant, Joshua Aaron, and Steve Young, architect, were present. <br />Van Zomeren distributed pictures taken from the site. She explained that Park Land Company <br />is interested in purchasing the property and proposed a 32 unit apartment building, with an <br />optional 4 units on the third floor. The property is zoned LR -1B in the rear along Kelly Avenue, <br />and B -4, Office and Professional District, in the front along Shadywood Road. The property is <br />three separate tax parcels and would require combination. The Planning Commission reviewed <br />the application at their May meeting, and voted 5 to 0 to recommend that the existing zoning,' <br />B -4, is the most appropriate category for the property; and that 32 units is too much density as <br />no zoning district exists that would allow 32 units. <br />Van Zomeren added that the property is located in the urban service area along Shadywood Road. <br />There are policies in the Comprehensive Plan regarding housing improvement in the urban <br />density residential district which are relevant to the sketch plan. The zoning issue is that the <br />Zoning Code does not have a zoning district that allows this number of dwelling units per acre. <br />Planning Commission discussed options to allow this type of development but determined that <br />a zoning amendment would be inconsistent with the current Comprehensive Plan. <br />13 <br />