My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-1998 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
05-11-1998 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2012 4:15:28 PM
Creation date
9/26/2012 4:15:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
u <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR MAY 11, 1998 <br />( #4) #2308 BROOK PARK REALTY, 3760 SHORELINE DRIVE - Continued <br />Gleason asked if the density credit is eliminated, how developers could afford the road? Jabbour <br />said the City's goal is to obtain the land for a park and that the road providing access to County Road <br />15 also provides access to the park. <br />Gleason explained how the road would be built in his mind, and who would pay for it. Flint said <br />Sohns proposed the City buy the whole piece for park. Flint asked Gleason why the original park <br />concept disappeared with 30 units. Gleason explained it was land that was not going to be used, but <br />would be owned by the association and would not be a park. <br />Gleason suggested to Tonka Venture, owner of the property, the possibility of going to court and <br />losing 10 units either way. He thinks Tonka Venture is agreeable to doing 20 units now and waiting <br />for access to County Road 15. Jabbour said the City was motivated to make the road happen. <br />Jabbour noted the current Council could not bind future Councils to force construction of a road to <br />County Road 15. <br />• Flint asked about the unnecessary road and sewer to the western edge of the property from the cul- <br />de -sac, and Gleason explained the sewer still has to be built and at some future time the road will <br />be necessary. <br />Gleason said the current footprint is good to accommodate trees and is a good development. <br />The discussion continued to deliberate whether the cul -de -sac was necessary, especially when the <br />road will continue through. <br />The City Attorney said he wants to clarify Council's position. Kelley moved to table this issue, and <br />to have an Executive Session after the Administrator's report. Peterson seconded. Vote: Ayes 5, <br />Nays 0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.