Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 27,1998 <br />( #7) #2354 KONRAD KRUGER, 520 HANLON AVENUE - VARIANCE <br />The applicant was not present. Jabbour suggested returning to this item later in the meeting. Review <br />of this item follows #14. <br />( #8) #2356 JON AND DIANE RAPPAPORT, 3067 FARVIEW LANE - VACATION OF <br />DRAINAGE EASEMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 4068 <br />The applicant was present. <br />Kelley explained that he wanted to discuss this item because sewer has been considered for this area. <br />In some sewer projects, the City has allowed residents in the project to "opt out" of the improvement <br />until they want to connect. The City then assumes their share of the cost. Kelley wanted the <br />applicant to be aware of the situation. <br />Jabbour responded that he had talked with the applicant. Mr. Rappaport explained that when he <br />bought the property, he knew he would have to put in a new septic system, therefore this is an <br />anticipated expenditure. Because of the proposed improvements he wants to make to the property, <br />. the septic system is required to be upgraded. <br />0 <br />Kelley questioned how the City would handle areas where sewer is planned but the 10 -year period <br />to upgrade had expired. Jabbour did not think the City would require a new septic system if sewer <br />was planned relatively soon. However, there would be other factors to consider such as what other <br />agencies might be monitoring the situation and the requirements they might have. <br />Goetten noted another criteria to be considered was Met Council approval for a sewer project. <br />Kelley added that the problem of a non - conforming septic system because of the 3' separation exists <br />throughout Orono. Many properties may not have additional sites available for septic upgrades. <br />Rappaport's property is fortunate to be within the proposed MUSA line. <br />Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4068 as proposed granting approval of <br />the vacation of a drainage easement, subject to granting a new easement. Vote: Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />5 . <br />