My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-23-1998 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
03-23-1998 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2012 4:12:33 PM
Creation date
9/26/2012 4:12:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL, <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 23, 1998 <br />( #16 - #2346 Mark and Pamela Palm - Continued) . <br />Goetten was informed that the building envelope and the applicant's plan to build up in <br />order to not add any structural coverage. Goetten questioned how close the neighboring <br />house is to the residence. Van Zomeren said the neighboring home is not as close as the <br />pictures make it seem. The neighbors have signed the acknowledgment. <br />Jabbour moved, Flint seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4056. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />( #17) #2348 MARY JANE HAUSER, 1540 BOHNS POINT ROAD - VARIANCES <br />Mr. Hauser was present. <br />Bressler presented pictures of the property and distributed full sized surveys. The <br />proposal is to construct a new residence requiring a hardcover variance in the 75 -250' <br />lakeshore setback. The previously proposed stormwater detention pond has been deleted <br />from the plan. The Planning Commission recommended approval for 25.9% of hardcover <br />in the 75 -250' setback where 29.8% hardcover was proposed by the applicant. The deck <br />had been larger and the loop driveway was reduced. <br />Bressler noted the plan of the applicant if the variance is denied. The driveway would <br />come straight in through a treed area. The hardships noted by the applicant involved <br />cuting trees and ettect on grading, relocation of utility poles, and headlights shining into <br />neighboring homes. The proposed driveway would reuse the existing driveway and <br />grades. <br />Goetten asked for the hardcover calculations for the driveway. Bressler indicated the <br />driveway was initially proposed at 3172 s.f but has been reduced approximately 800 s.f. <br />to 2390 s.f. The driveway is included in two zones but would not adversely affect the <br />250 -500' setback. <br />Hauser related the history behind the property and the application. The hardcover in the <br />75 -250' Lakeshore setback has been reduced from 32% to 25.9 %. He indicated the <br />problem is with the existing grades. Hauser said the house as proposed could be built <br />without a variance if the driveway were to come straight out from the garage. This <br />would require 5' retaining walls on both sides of the driveway. The garage would affect <br />sight lines. He reiterated the headlight problem as well. <br />Jabbour suggested reducing the size of the house. Hauser said he has already done that <br />indicating that he felt some of the rooms were now substandard. Jabbour informed <br />Hauser that the Council's obligation is to the ordinance and not to the neighborhood. He <br />stated that if this proposal was approved, it would set a precedent. Jabbour said he needs <br />to base his decision on hardships and how the land was made. <br />• <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.