My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
05-09-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2016 8:33:01 AM
Creation date
9/30/2016 8:22:25 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
590
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
computers, business analysts, legal consulting, and 50 staff which includes 38 certified <br />assessors to address resident concerns. <br />Council Member Printup asked where Orono falls in valuations are after the crash of 2009 <br />as to whether valuations have stabilized. City Administrator Loftus stated that Hennepin <br />County follows the market which means we are re-active and not pro-active. <br />We currently house other community’s property files and City Administrator Loftus <br />suggested compensation for that storage. Mr. Atchison said an $8,000 credit for 2015 and a <br />$5,000 credit for 2014 was reimbursed to the City for not using the full contract amount. <br />In conclusion the assessing contract expires July 31, 2016. Loftus stated this discussion was <br />to review Hennepin County process and provide information to Council. Printup would like <br />to poll other communities to learn how they do their assessing. <br />Mr. Atchison reminded Council that this is a full-time 2 person job not a weekend/evening <br />position. Orono takes a tremendous amount of effort to do the proper valuations. <br />Council Member Levang is not interested in looking at doing it differently due to the <br />excellent job the current assessors are providing the City of Orono. <br />Council Members Walsh and Printup would like more information so Council members can <br />answer resident inquiries. Why do communities choose to go with a private assessor? <br />Mr. Atchison relayed that many communities have moved to county services due to growth <br />and retirement of private assessors. <br />2. Cemetery Road Parking / Ownership <br />City Planner Mike Gaffron provided historical information for Cemetery Road. Cemetery <br />Road provides access to Union Cemetery. Currently employees of the Birch’s Restaurant <br />use the road for parking. Concerns have risen regarding the road integrity, maintenance <br />along with who actually owns cemetery road. <br />Gaffron reviewed the conclusions of his research. He believes it is a public road, never <br />dedicated but historically it is a public road. Discussion at this meeting centers on the issues <br />of regulating the parking of Birch’s employees, road ownership, and who is responsible for <br />road maintenance. <br />Walsh asked Long Lake Council Member Olson whether Long Lake would want total <br />ownership of the road and she responded no. The road is split, the north side belongs to <br />Long Lake and the south side belongs to Orono. Orono regularly plows the road during the <br />winter and posts weight restrictions in spring. The maintenance should be split 50/50 in the <br />event the road integrity is weakened. <br />The manager of Birch’s has been working with the cemetery board and agrees to direct his <br />employees to park on the south side which has solved the parking problem.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.