My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-12-2016 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
09-12-2016 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2016 4:09:06 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 4:07:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 12, 2016 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />20. #16-3554 ASHISH AGGARWAL ON BEHALF OF APEX HOLDINGS, LLC, 2635 <br />KELLEY PARKWAY, SKETCH PLAN REVIEW (continued) <br />The property is serviced with City sewer and water, with access off of Kelley Parkway. Development of <br />the property would require rezoning to RPUD, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, and re -platting <br />from an outlot to a lot per the provisions of the Stonebay PUD No. 4 Agreement. <br />The goal of the review is to provide the developer with an overview of the pertinent City ordinances and <br />how they affect the proposed development. <br />The property is located directly across Kelley Parkway from the Stonebay Lofts at the west end of the <br />long stormwater pond. The property is governed as part of the Stonebay Master Development Agreement <br />and is guided and planned for commercial office use. This property has the potential to assist in meeting <br />the City's residential urban density goals in order to allow continued development of Orono's sewered <br />lakeshore areas as intended. <br />Staff recommends the City Council's review of the sketch plan address the following: <br />Is there justification for the necessary CMP amendment and rezoning to allow the guiding of this <br />property to be converted from commercial to resident? If that conversion is not allowed, what <br />other uses for this site might be acceptable? <br />2. Is the Council comfortable with the density of the development at 20 units per acre gross? <br />3. If the developer had to construct a third story over part of the building in order to meet required <br />setbacks and hardcover limits while maintaining the same 70 units, how would the Council react? <br />Gaffron noted the applicant is not proposing three stories at this time. <br />4. Is there sufficient justification for flexibility in terms of hardcover and proximity of the building <br />to Wayzata Boulevard. <br />The Council should discuss whether this development should be required to create the RPUD <br />standard 10 percent private recreation space. <br />Staff recommends that a 10 -foot trail easement be retained along the south boundary of the <br />property. <br />7. The conceptual landscaping layout does not provide any buffering from Wayzata Boulevard. <br />Gaffron displayed a sketch of the proposed building and interior layout. <br />Gaffron noted the stormwater pond was originally sized to accommodate all elements of Stonebay and no <br />additional ponding will be required on this site. Because the site is so flat, the assumption is that in order <br />to make drainage function adequately and allow for underground parking, the site will require some <br />amount of fill, likely raising the main floor above the level of Kelley Parkway. An internal storm sewer <br />system is likely to be constructed on the site which will discharge to the pond. <br />Page 25 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.