08-22-2016 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 22, 2016 7:00 o'clock p.m. 13. SEX OFFENDER PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION (continued) Printup stated as far as overkill, in his view the residents would appreciate the overkill and that it helps protect the City and gives some comfort to the citizens by the City being proactive. McMillan noted it would not cover the entire City. Printup stated he understands that but that the City can be proactive on this item. Walsh stated he agrees with Council Member Printup. Walsh indicated he would like some clarification on Council Member Cornick's comment last meeting that the state ordinances were just fine. Walsh asked if the residency restrictions would be duplicating what the state has already or whether it would be more or less. Mattick stated he would need to review it a little bit closer but that he does not believe they are duplicating anything statutorily. Mattick stated it is his understanding that when sex offenders are released, they typically have conditions of probation, such as avoiding certain areas, and they are monitored individually on a case-by-case basis. Mattick noted the terms of probation can be stricter or more lax than the sample ordinance. Walsh stated the City would be codifying what the City believes is necessary for the protection of its citizens. Mattick stated the sample ordinance is nothing more than a cut and paste from Iowa and that Staff has not included any language specific for Orono. Mattick stated there are legal concerns about whether the City can pass something like this. In the State of Iowa, the ordinance was implemented and tried, which is why it was included in the packet. Mattick noted it was just meant to be a launching point for discussion. Walsh stated he did not understand where Council Member Cornick's comment was coming from. Mattick stated depending on the level of offender, the City would have to notify the community and hold public hearings. McMillan stated she would like to hear from Police Chief Farniok and Council Member Cornick since they have law enforcement background. Printup requested it be placed on a future City Council agenda. McMillan asked whether there should be a public hearing. Mattick stated since it likely would be placed in the public policy section of the City Code, a public hearing would not be necessary. Levang stated for the sake of transparency, there should be a public hearing so the City Council can get some input on what they would like to see the City do. McMillan stated she would like to see what protections are already in place and hear how police departments are currently handling things. Page 13 of 25