My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-08-2016 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
08-08-2016 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2016 4:07:12 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 4:06:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 8, 2016 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT (continued) <br />Printup indicated he is. Printup stated Staff could then look at it and compile different ordinances in the <br />meantime and that it could be completed in November. <br />McMillan stated the question is whether it rises to a priority level. McMillan stated the Council could <br />wait until November and then discuss it with the Planning Commission. McMillan noted typically areas <br />next to schools and parks are regulated and that Staff could provide a little background on things as well <br />as a sample ordinance. <br />Walsh noted this is more of a City Council decision and that they will be deciding whether the Planning <br />Commission should review it. <br />Barnhart stated treatment centers are more of a land use question and that the sex offender ordinance <br />would be more of a policy question. <br />McMillan suggested Staff think about what process should be followed and that they can talk about it <br />briefly in August at the work session. McMillan requested Staff find out whether it needs to go before the <br />Planning Commission. <br />Walsh stated he would like to see it on the August work session agenda. <br />McMillan stated if they determine it needs to go before the Planning Commission, they can place it on the <br />October meeting agenda. <br />Walsh stated the City Council will make the decision about whether it should go before the Planning <br />Commission right here and that they can put it on the August 22 agenda to discuss whether it should go <br />before them. <br />Mattick indicated he did provide Staff with a sample ordinance that was challenged and withstood legal <br />challenge. Mattick noted this is a relatively new issue and that one of the reasons that ordinance <br />withstood legal challenge was that it was not put into their zoning section of the code but it was placed in <br />the public safety section. Mattick stated generally only zoning issues go before the Planning <br />Commission. Mattick stated in terms of the process, it will depend on where the ordinance is placed and <br />how big of an issue it is. <br />Walsh stated in his view it does not need to go to a work session and that they can either make a decision <br />to send it to the Planning Commission or simply place it on the City Council agenda. <br />McMillan stated they can put it on the Council agenda whenever Staff is prepared to discuss it. <br />Printup commented it will start the conversation and get things moving. <br />Cornick stated he would be totally opposed to the ordinance since the current state protection system <br />protects the residents and anything the City does can be challenged in court. Cornick noted he ran the sex <br />offender registration program in Orono and that it works. Cornick stated in his view everything else is <br />overkill and subject to litigation. <br />Page 23 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.