My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-1998 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
03-09-1998 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2012 4:11:39 PM
Creation date
9/26/2012 4:11:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 9, 1998 <br />• ( #10 - #2339 James Render - Continued) <br />Carlson indicated that the low portion of Birch Lane is in a flood plain. He asked how far <br />the flood plain extends. Jabbour suggested Carlson discuss the issue with staff. He noted <br />that the Watershed District was redefining the flood plain, and this is a concern for the <br />Comprehensive Plan update. Jabbour informed Carlson that the Council will be <br />discussing stormwater at their work session. Carlson asked that an answer be given <br />regarding the possible connection of Birch Lane as it will affect many homes. <br />Mr. Lindner, 3440 North Shore Drive, reported that there are 4 homes served on his 10' <br />driveway. He noted that the fire chief had indicated at the Planning Commission meeting <br />that a fire truck must be within 500' of a pool to serve a property. Lindner said all of the <br />homes located in the back of the area can be served from CoRd 51 so questioned why <br />access needs to be provided elsewhere for the equipment. He felt a 28' road was not <br />aesthetically pleasing, noting there are smaller roads in the City. <br />Lindner said he has experienced problems with having the Maxwell Bay access nearby. <br />He felt the road would add to that problem, and he would be further affected if the road <br />was connected. Lindner noted there is no room for children to play in front of the homes <br />and the road would eliminate the ability for the children to play in the rear of the homes. <br />• Lindner reported that his home is 1500 s.f and others were about 2000 -2500 s.f. He <br />questioned how the proposed 4000 s.f homes would fit in to the neighborhood. Render <br />responded that the 4000 s.f includes all hardcover, including driveway. Lindner said he <br />would like to see the property divided into two lots only and asked that no variances be <br />allowed. <br />Ed Engler, 3450 Birch Lane, reported that Birch Lane ends at his garage. He noted the <br />large amount of traffic due to the public launch, the public access, and nearby marinas <br />resulting in no shelter from trattic for many of the neighbors. if the road was connected, <br />it would increase this problem. He felt the road connection would be dangerous and <br />create an unhealthy situation. <br />Debra Robertson, 3440 North Shore Drive, said the 10' driveway has served the four <br />homes for over 30 years with no problems. It baffled her to think that a 28' road was <br />required to serve three homes. Robertson reported that Birch Lane did run through the <br />property 80 years ago and a trade for access to Crystal Bay was made for CoRd 51. The <br />road connection would result in their losing their access to North Arm, and the properties <br />would be surrounded by three roads causing increased traffic. <br />Jabbour reported that the reason a 28' road was recommended was due to the vision of it <br />becoming a public road in the future. He said the Council is obligated to recommend <br />access that would accommodate fire trucks. Jabbour said the council is aware that the <br />area is congested and is attempting to control it as much as possible. He said it is not the <br />Council's vision to surround homes with roads. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.