02-23-1998 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 23, 1998 • (#4 - #2290 Elaine and Steve Silus - Continued) Peterson asked if the garage was built up higher from the original plans. Vang said the change in elevation occurred because of the use of the aerial, topographical maps instead of being done by a surveyor on site. Vang said discussions were held on site regarding the problems. The builder was informed that retaining walls higher than 4' are not allowed and cannot be nearer than 5' to the property line. The applicant then took action to drop the garage elevation so any retaining wall would be less than 4' high. Vang said the builder does not remember the remainder of the conversation regarding the 5' setback. Vang said it was suggested at the time of framing that the garage be changed to a front - load. He was informed at that time the applicant preferred the side- loading garage. Silus said he was not personally informed of the 5' setback requirement for the retaining wall. He said he is not in the position to change the entry into the garage at this time, adding that the opportunity to make that change has passed. Vang informed the Council that the Planning Department has incorporated the policy of requiring both the homeowner and builder be on site to discuss any conflicts that arise. Jabbour said it should also be in writing. Pat Spilseth reported that the applicant was told from the beginning of the application process that the garage should be front loading. She indicated this would be similar to • other homes on Casco Circle. Spilseth noted the small lot sizes in the area. Spilseth said she had never seen the elevation drawings before. She also noted that letters of concern were sent in by many of the neighbors. Jabbour said it would help if the applicant and neighbors met to discuss the alternatives. He felt the decision should not be made by the Council. It was noted that a front loading garage door would require the removal of a large tree. Jabbour confirmed with Barrett that the approval or denied of the application must be completed within a 60 -day time period. Jabbour said the applicant would not be able to bring the issue forward again for six months if the application was now denied. Spilseth said she was unaware that the option existed for front loading doors with the removal of a tree. Silus said that was not an option that he would explore. Jabbour noted the two options available. Silus indicated the retaining wall tapers from 0" at the garage to 2 -1/2' at its highest elevation. Jabbour asked if the driveway can be elevated without requiring retaining walls. Vang said no. Peterson asked what the slope of the driveway would be without a retaining wall. Vang said the maximum slope would be at 12% where 10% is normally allowed. n �J