Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 23, 1998 <br />( #8 - #2326 Orono Development - Continued) . <br />Kelley asked about drainage. He noted the pond elevation is lower than that of the <br />building. He was informed that tiling would be installed underground to collect the water <br />and transport it to the pond. Sepena indicated where the piping would be located. <br />Kelley asked about lighting. He is concerned with its impact on the neighboring <br />properties. Gaffron displayed the lighting plan. Dillon said they would work with Staff <br />to satisfy the needs of the businesses and neighborhood. Kelley asked that directional <br />lighting be used to reflect away from the neighbors. Kelley was informed that while their <br />insurance company may desire exterior lighting 24 hours a day, the issue would be <br />studied. Dillon noted that the expense of lighting is also a concern. Dillon indicated the <br />light choices made meet standard requirements. Sepena showed the locations of the four <br />light poles on the site plan. Additional lights would be placed over the doorways. <br />Kelley asked what type of poles would be used for the lighting. He was informed that the <br />style is a 20' shoebox with a single head bulb. Kelley asked the applicant to consider <br />putting the light pole indicated on the other side of the building and angle it towards the <br />building to shelter the light away from the residential area. Dillon agreed to study the <br />lighting issue noting the same concerns were expressed at the Planning Commission level. <br />Kelley asked the hours of operation. Dillon said the bank would have typical banking <br />hours. The coffee shop would open around 6:30 -7:00 a.m. and close between 10 -11:00 . <br />p.m. The bagel shop would open somewhat later. There would be limited hours of <br />operation on Sundays. Kelley asked if the applicant would allow a 24 hour operation. <br />Dillon said he did not believe that type of business would be attracted to this site. <br />Kelley asked about snow storage. Dillon said some snow could be moved to the pond <br />area but the majority would be hauled off site. <br />Jabbour indicated that the landscape architect asked that the applicant proceed carefully <br />with their lighting plan. Jabbour asked if there was a glare ordinance on lighting. <br />Gaffron said the ordinance requires that the source of the light not be visible outside of <br />the property. He believed the shoe -box style would address that concern. <br />Peterson said she continued to have reservations about the minimal parking setback. <br />Goetten said she appreciated the concerns for a possible upgrade of CoRd 19 in the <br />future but was concerned with the loss of parking if the Planning Commission <br />recommendation was approved. Peterson noted the amount of parking cannot be <br />reduced. Gaffron indicated the parking allotment was three spaces over the requirement. <br />He saw no area where the driving space could be reduced. A change in parking would <br />change the marketability of the building and require a totally new set of plans. Jabbour <br />said a plan for a taller building would not be preferred. <br />12 <br />