Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE . <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,July 16,2012 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> the developer should consider including a proposed grading plan for this lot if a walk-out home is to be <br /> proposed. <br /> This project will trigger the need for the developer to conduct and submit a conservation design plan. The <br /> property has an area of existing woods along CSAH 6 and a pine stand along the eastern property line, <br /> one 5-acre wetland and an open view-shed over the wetlands fro County Road 6. The Rural Oasis Study <br /> and Conservation Design Master Planning process has been formulated to help determine on a case-by- <br /> case basis what natural values should be preserved. <br /> The applicant is proposing to plat Outlot A to create a 50-foot private road corridor with a 100-foot cul- <br /> , de-sac as required by the Subdivision Ordinance and the CMP for a local private road.The existing <br /> driveway access to CSAH 6 should be abandoned. The standard paved width for this road would be 24 <br /> feet with a 50-foot diameter cul-de-sac. An access permit is required from Hennepin County in order to <br /> � relocate the access and create the private road. <br /> The City requires standard perimeter, drainage and utility easements around all property boundaries in the <br /> plat as well as Conservation and Flowage Easements over the delineated wetlands and wetland buffers. A <br /> trail currently exists on the south side of CSAH 6. The Flanning Commission should discuss whether the <br /> dedication of a trail easement in the applicant's property along the north side of CSAH 6 should be <br /> required as part of this application. <br /> The subject property is not located within the MCTSA so sewer service is not available to these properties. <br /> The properties are proposed to be served by septic systems and private wells. � <br /> Issues for discussion by the Planning Commission include the Conservation Design,grading of the site, <br /> existing buildings, and access. As it relates to Conservation Design,the developer should develop a plan <br /> which identifies and outlines measures for preserving the ecological assets unique to this property. This <br /> plan should be submitted to the City with an application for preliminary plat review. <br /> As it relates to grading,the developer should consider a master grading plan which includes building pad <br /> locations as part of the preliminary plat review process.The topography shown on the sketch plan survey <br /> was taken from the City's topographic maps. The actual site topography will need to be field verified <br /> with a preliminary plat application. The developer should identify which, if any, of the existing structures <br /> will remain. � <br /> In regards to access,the applicant is proposing to create an outlot in a new location for the new private <br /> road. Creating the private road to City standards may impact the adjacent wetlands. The City would <br /> � expect that the existing curb cut for the current driveway at CSAH 6 be eliminated and the remainder of <br /> the driveway, as it cuts through Lots 3 and 4, be removed. The additional hardcover may trigger the need <br /> for creation of a stormwater management pond. The developer should work with the Minnehaha Creek <br /> Watershed District to determine if the road will require a stormwater pond. The location of the pond <br /> • should not result in a substandard size lot and should be included on the preliminary plat drawings. <br /> Curtis stated the goal of this review is to provide the developer with an overview of the pertinent City <br /> ordinances and how they affect the proposed plat. The Planning Commission should discuss the strengths <br /> and weaknesses of the proposal. During the sketch plan review,the developer should advise whether any <br /> of the issues noted present any problems so that those issues can be discussed and addressed by the <br /> Planning Commission. <br /> Page <br /> 13 <br />