My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-18-2012 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2012
>
06-18-2012 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2012 3:29:13 PM
Creation date
9/18/2012 3:28:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Q PC Exhibit D <br /> ACCOMPLISHMENTS CHECKLIST <br /> GOALS and GENERAL DIRECTION: <br /> ➢ Simplify the regulations <br /> ✓ Definitions of building coverage and building footprint better linked and justified <br /> ✓ Tiers eliminated <br /> ✓ Hardcover calculated on gross lot area in all cases <br /> ✓ Regulations all in one location vs.spread throughout code <br /> ➢ Maintain historical protection level <br /> � ✓ Regulating only those parcets currently being regulated plus logical omissions based on <br /> . geography and relative impact to area water quafity <br /> ✓ Entirety of parcels regulated now vs. many parcels that were only partially regulated under <br /> current codes <br /> �✓ OHW to 75'setback area still protected ,_ <br /> ❑ Lakeshore lots will see an�increase in allowed hardcover given that the 0—75'area will now be <br /> factored into how much hardcover the parcel may allow . <br /> ■ New allowance will bring Orono more in-line with allowances in other lakeshore <br /> communities � <br /> ■ New allowance shouldn't be considered a significant change given the number of variances <br /> the City has granted to hardcover over the years(in other words, if you know the city will be <br /> granting a variance anyway,the standard should be higher) <br /> ➢ Be open to new technologies that can be shown to work <br /> ➢. Flexibility still not present to allow for engineering review and approval for site specific BMPs <br /> ➢ Provide multiple avenues to comply with code ` <br /> ➢ Code still maintains the existing standard of ineet the required percentage or request a variance <br /> ➢ Focus on"achieving desired results" • <br /> ➢ The proposed language still focuses on meeting a strict hardcover standard rather than focusing <br /> on resulting water quality <br /> ➢ Continue massing standards <br /> ✓ Massing standards are clarified but maintained within the new code <br /> ➢ Maintenance&Enforcement <br /> ✓ The revised pcescriptive ordinance does not include a mechanism to ensure hardcover does not <br /> change overtime and/orthat stormwaterfacilities are maintained <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.