Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#12-3559 f <br /> � June 12,2012 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> indicated the intended use for the building. The conceptual sketch in Exhibit E suggests <br /> a 'horse barn' look; does the anticipated use of the building (garage space? general <br /> storage? recreation?) enter into Planning Commission's consideration? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br /> property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br /> 3. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance, if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the neighborhood? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff recommends approval of the accessory structure location variance, subject to the standard <br /> Oversized Accessory Structure Covenant. <br /> F: . �. . <br />