Laserfiche WebLink
this denial was not directiv communicated to the landowner who was the one who is now <br /> sufferin� the consequences The landowner represents that if he was made aware of a denial on <br /> the project he would have taken unmediate steps to inquire further and certainlxwould have not <br /> authorized the contactor to continue to do work. The onlv two possibilities are that the notice <br /> was �iven to the contractor who then disre�arded the notice or the notice was not �iven. In <br /> either circumstance it is the landowner who is now suffering��the consequences, and who is <br /> respectfizll�askin� the Cit�personnel to �rant the variance so that he mav obtain a permanent. <br /> and lawful solution. <br /> Dated: � , 2012 <' <br /> ussell Schumer <br /> t..., <br /> , <br /> RECEOV�D <br /> JUN 0 6 2012 <br /> CaTI(OF�R�NO <br /> 4 <br />