Laserfiche WebLink
� • <br /> this denial was not directiv communicated to the landowner, who was the one who is now <br /> suffering the consequences. The landowner represents that, if he was made aware of a denial on <br /> the project he would have taken immediate steps to inquire further, and certainlv would have not <br /> authorized the contactor to continue to do work. The only two possibilities are that the notice <br /> was �iven to the coniractor who then disreg�arded the notice, or the notice was not �iven. In <br /> either circumstance it is the landowner who is now sufferin� the consequences, and who is <br /> respectfully askin� the Cit�personnel to �rant the variance so that he mav obtain a permanent, <br /> and lawful solution. <br /> Dated: , 2012 <' • / <br /> ussell Schumer <br /> � <br /> �t. <br /> �� � iZECE�IV'�D <br /> � JUN 0 6 2012 <br /> C9�'1(OF ORONO <br /> � 4 <br />