Laserfiche WebLink
� r <br /> � � NIINiTTES OF THE " � . <br /> "ORONO CZTY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,3une 25,2012 <br /> ' . 7:00 a'clock p.m. _ ��, <br /> . . . ; <br /> (3. #IO-349I CITY OF ORONO-HAltDCOVER REGULATIONS AMENDMENT, Continued) <br /> � McMillan stated if the City went•with the DNR percenta.ge, any lot within the first 1000 feet from the <br /> , �shoreli.ne has�o be 25 percent. McMillan noted the DNR has just one set number for all lots.wifihin 1000 � <br /> feet of the lakeshore with no tier system. . - � � , <br /> McMillan noted the City does see applications for hardcover on_properties that are not next to the lake but <br /> the runoff does impact the shoreline properties. . <br /> � Gozola stated there are a lot of situations in the City right now where properties aze not regulated at all <br /> � and that the overlay.map and tiers gives a sense of faimess. <br /> � McMillan commented she would Iike to l�ow the impact that the lots located further away from the lake <br /> have on runoff. � <br /> �-`}5; Rahn stated that Ma or McMillan is reall .about two zones; one tier for ro erties tha.t are <br /> • . Y Y�g. P P , -��; <br /> within1000 feet and another tier for properties beyond 1000 feet. Rahn stated in his view tiers are very " � <br /> � similar to zones. • . . � <br /> � McMillan noted Staff did not run any numbers on various lots using the DNR regulations and how that <br /> . would compare with the different tiers. . � <br /> Gozola stated.they attempted to match the City's existing regulations as well as they could. {f <br /> McMillan commented it might be wort]i it to look at having simply 25 percent of the lot area as the DNR <br /> does. <br /> Gozola stated they have not looked at that and that it wbuld result in a number of properties that are at 30 _ <br /> percent becomi.ng noricompliant. <br /> Franchot asked if the whole approach was to try to avoid creating nonconformities. <br /> Gozola indicated that was the case. � <br /> Franchot pointed out if they went with 25 percent across the board,that it would create a lot of change for � <br /> a number of people. � <br /> Rahn stated the direction at the bea nning was to try to si.mplify things and see if we can go away from <br /> zones. <br /> McMillan stated the people with 0-75 foot.zones would stand to gain under that scenario since they are <br /> " not allowed°to include the 0-75-foot setback in their calculations':�� "' <br /> Rahn commented it would be interesting to.look at case studies of what a variance would look Iike under <br /> both se�s of regulations. <br /> Bremer asked as it relates to Division 4, if someone wanted to change the pitch of the roof and update <br /> their house,whether that would be allowed. � - • <br /> Page 10 of 1 S <br />