Laserfiche WebLink
' , � <br /> � NIINLT'TES OF 1'HE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL 1VIEETIl�iG <br /> � Monday,3une 25,2012 <br /> . . . 7:00 o'clock p.m. . <br /> � <br /> (3. #10-3491 CITY OF ORONO-SARDCOVER REGi1LATlONS AMENDMEIVT', Continued) <br /> encroaching on your neighbor's properiy,that hardcover will be counted,against you,which is a <br /> clarifica�ion from the existing language. � <br /> � Rahn asked if that is something that the City has enforced in the past. � <br /> Gozola indicated that is how the Code has been interpreted and regulated in the past but it is not cleaz in <br /> � the current ordi.nance. <br /> � . . . <br /> Rahn commented it is hard for him to assess somebody`s driveway that might cross the property Ii.ne back <br /> • into the percentage of hardcover. . <br /> Bremer asked if you would include the hazdcover of your driveway that encroaches into your neighbor's <br /> Property ' � <br /> . .. :,:.� <br /> �Gozola stated in his view�you would not. Gozola stated this is an in.centive for people to correct those <br /> � types of situations. . � <br /> _ . Bremer.asked if he would envision it as if that 100 square feet were on a different part of the property. <br /> Gaf&on stated there have been occasions where there were fairly significant encroachments that Staff _ <br /> would include in both the enumerator and denom.i.nator of the properiy. If someone has an excess of 100 � <br /> square feet of hardcover that is on the neighbor's property, Staff is going to expand the size of the <br /> property for calculation purposes by 100 square feet and add all of that hardcover into the calculation. <br /> Bremer asked if that is how the language is written in the new ordi.nance. . <br /> Gozola stated the City can follow its past pracrices and that in his view the proposed language would not <br /> prohibit them from doing that. . <br /> Gaf&on stated he is in agreement that it would not preclude the City from doing that analysis. <br /> Bremer stated she would li.ke them to define what that analysis is in the ordi.nance. <br /> Gaffron asked if someone is encroachi.ng on a piece property,whether that means that piece of property is <br /> no longer included in the calculation. <br /> McMillan sta.ted in her view the lot area should be the person's boundaries. <br /> Rahn stated the pazcel that is being encroached upon could be looked upon as a shared driveway situation. <br /> �• Rahn stated that will need to be looked at a little closer. ��� '"� <br /> Gozola stated as it relates to the provision on the prohibition of hardcover within the 0-75 foot zone, <br /> under the existing code people cannot put hardcover in the 0-75 foot zone and the new langua.ge would <br /> include tha.t same prohibition. <br /> � <br /> Page 6 of 15 <br />