My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-16-2012 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2012
>
07-16-2012 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2012 11:04:24 AM
Creation date
9/18/2012 11:04:13 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' � S <br /> � NIINUTES OF THE <br /> � ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING . <br /> . Monday,3une 25,'2012 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. f—., <br /> . � <br /> (3. #IO-349I CITY OF ORONO-SARDCOVER REGUL�4TIONS AMENDMENT, Continued) <br /> Rahn suggested the language be amended to say retaining.walls that aze required or necessary. Rahn <br /> noted it also talks about decks with permeable surface below. Rahn stated the City cannot assume that all <br /> decks are pervious. Rahn asked if the defvution of decks is included somewhere else in the ordi.nance. <br /> ' Gozola stated decks are included as hazdcover just in general but that they are saying 100 square feet,if it <br /> is pervious below,would be allowed. Gozola indicated Staff would review the decks on an individual <br /> basis. <br /> � Bremer commented it would really be pervious decks with pervious surface below. � <br /> McMillan.stated.it could be a concrete deck or some other impervious material. . <br /> �. Rahn asked whether homes on the lake that were constructed without a deck and are at the maxi.mum <br /> amount of hardcover would be allowed.to put a 100 square foot deck on,t.heir home aftez this ordi.nance , <br /> .�. .. <br /> passes. <br /> Gozola indicated under the new ordinance,they would be allowed 100 square feet of patio or deck <br /> without going through a variance process regazdless of the amount of hazdcover on the lot. Gozola stated <br /> that history has shown that cities typically will allow a 100 square foot deck or patio. <br /> Bremer statecl she disagrees with that because the City Council has not typically allowed people 100 . . � <br /> square feet of deck�or patio if they aze over or maxed out on their hardcover. � <br /> � Rahn asked if there is a house with 200 square feet of e�sting deck,whether they would be allowed <br /> another 100 square feet. <br /> Gozola indicated they would not be allowed an additional 100 square feet of hardcover. � <br /> Rahn stated in his view that is penalizing the people who did it right and allowing�the people who maxed <br /> out their hardcover to come back to the City and ask for another 100 square feet of deck or patio. <br /> � . Gozola sta.ted the City could look at their 200 squaze feet of deck and only count 100 square feet against <br /> their hardcover on their lot,which would be a credit of 100 square feet. <br /> McMillan asked where swimming pools would fall into the definitions. <br /> Gozola indicated swimm;ng pools would be considered hardcover. <br /> McMillan asked if that is included in the ordi.nance. " <br /> Gozola indicated that could be included under Item No. 1. <br /> ' Rahn commented they would not be able to Iist every sin�le item,but since swimm;ng pools are a more <br /> commonly requested item;he would recommend listing it. � <br /> McMillan stated she would move Item 2 into the hardcover exclusions section but that they can discuss � _.. <br /> that later. <br /> Page 4 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.