Laserfiche WebLink
� ,t ` ,s <br /> FILE#12-3565 " <br /> ' 11 July 2012 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> were granted on properties with similarly sized 75'to 250'zones. <br /> The lot width at 100' is not uncommon in the LR-16 zone, and the proposed construction will meet <br /> all required setbacks. The lot was created priortothe current code requirements and no additional <br /> � land is availableto make it conforming. . ' <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> _ 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br /> property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance, if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the neighborhood? <br /> , <br /> • 3. Does the Commission find the historical data in Exhibit H to be relevant to the review � � <br /> of this application? If so should a hardcover variance be granted? <br /> ;, 4. Does_the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br /> � . �potential impacts created by the granting of the requested variances? � • � <br /> 5. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? . <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> . ��'�`` Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width variance. Additionally, staff recommends the <br /> Planning Commission hold the public hearing and discuss the applicant's hardcover request <br /> � weighing it against the current hardcover regulations; the historical information; and the pending <br /> potential new hardcover regulations and make a recommendation to the Council regarding the � <br /> hardcover level proposed. <br />