Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#16-3861 . <br /> September 14,2016 <br /> Page 6 of 6 <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use <br /> the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official <br /> control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the lot area and width variances, as <br /> well as the hardcover and lot coverage variances, if granted will not alter the <br /> essential character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. Does Planning Commission find justification for granting a structural lot <br /> coverage variance for this new construction? <br /> 4. If the Planning Commission concludes that the variances as requested or in <br /> some other manner or configuration are justified, does the Commission find it <br /> necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the <br /> granting of the variances? <br /> 5. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> If Planning Commission determines that the practical difficulties test is met and the <br /> variances are justified, then a recommendation for approval may be in order. If Planning <br /> Commission finds that the practical difficulties test is not met for one or more of the <br /> requested variances, a recommendation for denial, partial denial, or tabling for revisions, <br /> may be appropriate. Options for action include: <br /> 1) Recommend approval (with or without specific conditions). <br /> 2) Recommend partial approval (specify) <br /> 3) Recommend denial, stating reasons. <br /> 4) Table for further information or revisions — specify what information or changes <br /> are desired. <br /> 5) Other. <br />