My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
09-19-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:27 PM
Creation date
9/20/2016 10:08:30 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16-3855 - <br /> September 14,2016 <br /> Page 10 of 10 <br /> 3. Portions of the property located less than 250 feet from the creek or less than 250 feet <br /> from the OHWL of Long Lake are not eligible to be rezoned to RPUD nor are they <br /> subject to flexibility in terms of lot standards. Applicants are requesting that these areas <br /> be included in the RPUD rezoning in order to allow flexibility due to the physical <br /> limitations of the site. Does Planning Commission find any reason to vary from this <br /> RPUD prohibition? <br /> 4. Due to the number of units to be served; the proposed overall density of development; <br /> and the use of municipal sewer and water systems, it could be argued that the road system <br /> should be public. Applicants are prepared for the road to be private. Planning <br /> Commission should discuss the merits of this being a public or private road. <br /> 5. Planning Commission should discuss whether this development should be required to <br /> create the RPUD standard 10% private recreation area, and whether the proposed internal <br /> trail system would satisfy that requirement. <br /> 6. Can Planning Commission identify any other topics that should be addressed regarding <br /> this concept plan review? <br /> Sketch Plan Review Parameters <br /> The goal of this review is to provide the developer with an overview of the pertinent CiTy <br /> ordinances and how they affect the proposed plat, and to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of <br /> the proposal. The above "Summary of Issues for Consideration" reveals a number of issues with <br /> the proposed plat and should provide direction to the applicants regarding the plat. Planning <br /> Commission should review each topic and identify any issues to which the developer should pay <br /> special attention. <br /> As a sketch plan review, any comments or suggestions to the applicants are non-binding but will <br /> be extremely helpful as the applicants move forward. Because the concept technically is a <br /> departure from the current zoning and CMP density guidelines for development of the site, this <br /> sketch plan will also be presented to the City Council for comment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.