My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-15-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
08-15-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:27 PM
Creation date
9/20/2016 9:27:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE . <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,July18,2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> The proposed development incorporates three different parcels. These three parcels are guided <br /> differently, with the two eastern lots being guided for mixed use and the western lot being guided for low <br /> density residential. The developer proposes to guide all three parcels low density residential; however, <br /> the proposed development is slightly higher in density than that classification. <br /> The proposed density represents a reduction in proposed gross density from the approved Comprehensive <br /> Plan. The area is guided at four units per acre on the east side and overall the density is guided at 10.22 <br /> units. To achieve the four units an acre envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan, attached residential units <br /> would be expected and could include townhomes or apartments/condominiums. <br /> As it relates to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the Planning Commission should focus on the <br /> following topics: <br /> 1. The applicants propose development at a density of 3.28 units per acre rather than the 4-15 units <br /> per acre for which the eastern half of the property is guided and have requested a Comprehensive <br /> Plan Amendment to allow the lower density. <br /> a. Should the City be striving for more density or less density at this location? <br /> b. Is the single-family concept right for this area? Does it match the City's goals in terms of <br /> housing type and density? <br /> c. Will the City benefit from a development such as this? Should the entire property be <br /> developed in this manner or should this site incorporate more than one style of houses? <br /> The subject property is considered to be a transition area between the commercial and institutional uses <br /> along Shadywood and the residential uses on Lydiard Circle/Avenue to the south and Kelly Avenue to the <br /> west. The proposed development will have little to no interaction with the adjacent residential <br /> neighborhoods as there are no vehicular connections or trails out of the property to the south, north, or <br /> west. The portion of the project adjacent to Kelly Avenue is currently a wetland and the developer is <br /> proposing no plans to impact this wetland other than mitigation of invasive plant material. <br /> A Conservation Development report has been submitted and includes a Rural Oasis Study, a Natural <br /> Resources Inventory, wetland delineations, a tree inventory, and review of existing drainage patterns. <br /> The western one-third of the project area is a Manage 3 wetland, which requires a 20-foot buffer. A 35- <br /> foot buffer setback is proposed, which is greater than the minimum required. The City will require a <br /> Conservation and Flowage Easement over the wetlands being preserved. <br /> A significant portion of the eastern half of the project area was clear cut in 2012. Remaining trees can be <br /> found along the edges of the project area and on the slope above the wetland. A number of volunteer <br /> shrubs or plants can be found in the center of the development area. The developer is proposing to <br /> preserve existing significant trees to the extent possible but a number of them will be impacted by the <br /> planned road connection. The developer should be required to submit a more detailed landscaping plan. <br /> The internal road serving the development is proposed to be public,which is in line with the provisions of <br /> the CMP Transportation Plan. The proposed road is approximately 220 feet long and ends in a cul-de- <br /> sac. Hennepin County will need to approve the location of the entrance/exit to this development; <br /> although preliminary discussions with the County indicate that they are supportive of the proposed <br /> location. The proposed road is 28 feet in paved width and will be located within a 50-foot platted <br /> corridor, thus meeting the City's standard for a public road system. <br /> Page 6 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.