My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-15-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
08-15-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:27 PM
Creation date
9/20/2016 9:27:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, <br /> FILE#16-3851 <br /> 9 Aug 2016 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> Applicable Regulations: <br /> Rear and Side Yard Setback Variances (Code Section 78-1434) <br /> The property is a corner lot. By definition, as the short side, Shoreline Drive is considered the <br /> "front"yard for setback purposes;the south lot line is the rear.The garage exceeds 1,000 <br /> square feet and is therefore defined as an oversized accessory structure (OAS) requiring <br /> additional setbacks. The property owner would like to construct a second story over the OAS, <br /> an upward expansion,to allow for storage and living space on the second level. Because the OAS <br /> does not meet the required 30-foot setbacks from all property lines,variances are required. <br /> A side setback variance is requested to allow expansion of the second story 28.4'from the side <br /> lot line where a 30-foot setback is required; additionally a variance is requested to allow <br /> expansion 11.9'from the rear lot line where a 30-foot setback is required. <br /> Buildin�to Buildin�Separation Variance (Code Section 78-1438) <br /> The code requires a 10-foot separation between buildings to reduce the appearance of massing. <br /> The existing screen porch structure is 10 feet from the nearest garage corner, however the <br /> property owner proposes to construct the addition in line with the foundation of the west side <br /> of the house to the extent of the existing deck. This results in a one foot encroachment into the <br /> 10 separation requirement from corner to corner. <br /> Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) <br /> In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br /> proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and <br /> anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect <br /> on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider <br /> recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances <br /> where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique <br /> to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is <br /> demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning <br /> Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties <br /> also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. <br /> Variances shall be granted for earth-sheftered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, <br /> subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a <br /> variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the <br /> affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary <br /> use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br /> According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: <br /> 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance.The <br /> proposed addition and second story on the garage are residential in nature.There is <br /> adequate space for light air and open space between the proposed addition and <br /> garage;the proposed second story addition will not further encroach into the rear or <br /> side setbacks.The variances are in harmony with the Ordinance. <br /> 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a <br /> permit for construction of improvements to a single family residence and residential <br /> garage in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> 3. The applicant establishes that there are practicaf difficulties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.