Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE . <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,July18,2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Ponzetti noted he has lived there for 22 years and that he saw what happened four or five years ago when <br /> they clear cut the site. Ponzetti stated if a commercial operation goes in there, the same thing would <br /> happen again with the trees. Ponzetti stated under this plan, Kelly Avenue appears to be minimally <br /> impacted with the exception of the trees. Ponzetti stated other than a concern that enough trees are <br /> planted or left, he cannot see anything wrong with the project as proposed. <br /> Acting Chair Lemke closed the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. <br /> Lemke noted the Commissioners have seen the e-mails that have been submitted. Lemke stated he was <br /> not present when the sketch plan was initially discussed but that it appears the developer has incorporated <br /> most of the recommendations into his plan and that the Council is in favar of going in this same direction. <br /> Schoenzeit commented the City has seen a number of proposals for this site and that this recent proposal <br /> is probably the most appealing and has the least impact on Kelly Avenue. Schoenzeit stated as a <br /> recommendation going forward, he would like the developer to create a very detailed landscaping plan <br /> showing the trees that will remain and that perhaps the church could speak with the developer about <br /> perhaps picking up the cost of the fence. Schoenzeit noted the City has the opportunity to control the <br /> access point to some degree and get the proper landscaping planted. <br /> Lemke noted the Planning Commission is being asked to review a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and <br /> asked whether the Commission feels the City should be striving for more density ar less density at this <br /> location. <br /> Schoenzeit commented the City talks a good game on density, but anytime someone proposes high <br /> density, the City tends to run away from it. Schoenzeit stated in his view this is a good place for mixed <br /> use but that is not the proposal before the Planning Commission. <br /> McGrann asked if subsequent changes to the CMP would need to go through a similar process. <br /> Barnhart indicated they would and that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is based upon what is before <br /> the Commission this evening. <br /> Lemke asked whether the Commission feels a single-family concept is right for this area and whether it <br /> matches the City's goals in terms of housing type and density. <br /> Leskinen stated she would concur with Commissioner Schoenzeit's comments and that it would be a nice <br /> spot for mixed use. Leskinen stated since that is not before the Planning Commission,the next logical <br /> use would be single-family residential. <br /> McGrann and Schwingler indicated they are in agreement. <br /> Lemke stated the next question is whether the City will benefit from a development such as this and <br /> whether the site should incorporate more than one style of housing. <br /> Schoenzeit commented the number of houses being proposed is limited. <br /> Lemke asked if there is a market for this type of house. <br /> Page 12 of 19 <br />