My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-15-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
08-15-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:27 PM
Creation date
9/20/2016 9:27:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,July18,2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> station. Barnhart stated they seemed comfortable with that and that he could ask them to send a new letter <br /> if that would be helpful. <br /> Rick Denman, Charles Cudd Company, stated the most important thing he can say is that they have <br /> developed a number of neighbors over the years and that this is a smaller neighborhood development <br /> aimed at a niche market. Denman noted they have invited the neighbors, City Council, and Planning <br /> Commission members to visit some of their other similar models in Medina. <br /> Denman noted this site is a transitional area and that they are moving from larger single-family homes to <br /> smaller lots. Denman stated the other option would be to construct something that is higher density but <br /> that they believe there is a market for this product. <br /> Lemke asked if the City has not done the engineering review or whether the applicant still needs to <br /> complete that. <br /> Barnhart stated the engineering and calculations by the applicant have been received but that Staff has not <br /> had time to completely review the findings. Barnhart stated he is confident it will be completed prior to <br /> City Council review. <br /> Lemke asked if the same issue applies to the storm water management. <br /> Barnhart indicated it does. <br /> Lemke asked if the applicant will be providing a more detailed landscaping plan. <br /> Denman indicated they will be. Denman stated they have not yet determined what type of trees will be <br /> planted and in what locations. <br /> McGrann asked what the landscaping will look like from Kelly Avenue and how many trees will be <br /> removed. <br /> Denman stated there is actually quite a buffer area that will remain. From the wetland area, there will be <br /> a 35-foot buffer that cannot be touched and will remain natural. Denman indicated there are some trees <br /> located in that area. <br /> McGrann asked if there is an elevation change from the 35-foot setback to where the development would <br /> end. <br /> Barnhart indicated it is 930' in tlle wetland area and the corner of the house is 941 feet,which is 11 feet <br /> between the two points. Barnhart pointed out the wetland and the buffer area on the overhead and noted <br /> the buffer area is around 933'. <br /> Schoenzeit asked if there are any improvements being proposed for the Kelly Avenue piece or whether it <br /> is merely being added for the acreage. <br /> Barnhart indicated there are some improvements that will encroach onto the Kelly Avenue piece. <br /> Barnhart pointed out the existing property lines for the parcels. <br /> Page 9 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.