Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
�°�o <br /> C ITY OF ORONO <br /> I�ESOLUT'ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��'1 , ti�� N�. � 425 <br /> "�KFSHo� <br /> c. The location of the Applicants' home is partially ahead of the average <br /> lakeshore setback line. There is no conforming location lakeward of the home <br /> to construct additions or a deck. <br /> d. The proposed screen porch and deck will meet the 75-foot lake setback. <br /> e. The Property wiil conform to the hardcover limitations of a Tier 1 property. <br /> f. The Applicants' request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the <br /> ordinance. <br /> g. The Appiicants have demonstrated that enforcing the provisions of the Zoning <br /> Ordinance deprives the Applicants of the reasonable use of their Property. <br /> h. The Applicants' proposed screen porch and deck will not alter the essential <br /> character of the neighborhood and wili result in minimal or no negative impact <br /> on adjacent properties. <br /> i. The Applicants' proposal to construct the screen porch and deck ahead of the <br /> average lakeshore setback will not adversely impact lake views enjoyed from <br /> the adjacent home to the south. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application inciuding the findings and <br /> recommendation of the Pianning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br /> the Applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the <br /> health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this Property are peculiar to <br /> it and do not apply generaliy to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br /> the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the Applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty; <br /> is necessary to preserve a substantiai property right of the Applicants; and would <br /> be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive <br /> Plan of the City. <br /> Pave 2 of 4 <br />