Laserfiche WebLink
�� °�\ <br /> O .�,^ O � CITY of ORONO <br /> ��� <br /> _������ a, <br /> �t <br /> ,� j������� �, � I RESOLUTION OF�I-F� �IT�' COUNCIL <br /> �x � �� ti .1 <br /> �� p �;�� :.�;� �ti, NO. <br /> ��kESH�4� <br /> a. The Property contains 48.665 square feet in area and has a defined width of <br /> 1 Q�-feet at the fake and 172-feet at the 75-foot setback. <br /> b. Tne Property has a unique shape and is iocated at the northern most point of <br /> th� channel which extends to Forest Lake. Du� to the nature of the <br /> lakeshore the Property is somewl�at dis:;onnected trom the lake proper. <br /> c. The location of the Applicants' home is partially ahead of the average <br /> lakeshore setback fine. There is no conforming location lakeward of the home <br /> to construct a pool. <br /> d. The proposed patio, in-ground pooi and walis will meet th� 75-foot lake <br /> setbacE:. <br /> e. The Property will conform to the rardcover limi;ations o` a Tier 1 property. <br /> f. The cor,stru�tion of the home in 2011 trigaered the es,abfishment of a 5C-foot <br /> wetland quffer and at th� time tne City required a 20-Toot setback Trom the <br /> bufrer Tor any stru�ture. In 2013, tne City's wstland regu�ations were <br /> amended to eliminate the City buffer requirement and es;ablished a 35' <br /> setback Trom the adge of a defineated wetland or a 10 foot setback Trom the <br /> @GQ� 0` an estabfished buff?C TO!' struciures and 'nardCOV�I'. <br /> g. Tne U�SIOpe edgA OF thA �JG T00� WBtiand buTTer extenGs �' ta �2' iandward <br /> rrom tne 75 setba�k iine. <br /> h. Tne most iakeward proposed wal! extends inio an existing 20' utility <br /> easem�nt which extends across the Proraerty just west of the proposed pool. <br /> The proposed wall is a repiacement of an existing wall in the same qeneral <br /> iocaiior. The Appiicants should enter into an cncroachment Fegresment for <br /> any improvements construcT�d within the existino easement. <br /> i. The Appiicants' reauest is in harmony with the purpose and intent o` the <br /> ordirance. <br /> j. The Aapii�ants nave d�mor,strat�d that entor;,ing tne provisions of tne Zoning <br /> Ordinance deprives the P,pp(icants o�th� reasonable use o`tneir Prop�rty. <br /> k. The Applicants� proqo5ed elevated paiio is designed in a way wnich <br /> minimizes impact of the visual encraachment as OppCSAd to the existing <br /> elevated deck. <br /> Pa�e 2 of � <br />