Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL FETING OF APRIL 24, 1989 <br />• POLICE SUPERVISORY STRUCTURE <br />lieutenant position. Councilmember Peterson asked why Chief <br />Kilbo had requested that this item be tabled. Kilbo replied that <br />he wanted the Council to have an adequate amount of time to <br />review the material presented. In answer to Goetten's question, <br />Kilbo replied that approving the organizational chart of his <br />choice would in fact be approving a third lieutenant position. <br />Mayor Grabek resurrected Councilmember Peterson's earlier <br />concern about the dedication of the police officers. He said it <br />may cause problems, not only among the police officers, but among <br />the Citizens of Orono as well. dedicated police officers. <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember <br />Callahan, to approve Chief Kilbo's organizational chart and <br />request for a third lieutenant. Councilmember Peterson <br />questioned whether that would include only the additional salary <br />for the lieutenant, or would it include the $50,000.00 salary for <br />an additional police officer. Councilmember Goetten stated that <br />she could not approve the expenditure of $50,000.00. <br />Councilmember Callahan asked Kilbo if it was in fact his <br />intention to promote a police officer to lieutenant and then hire <br />an additional police officer? Kilbo replied that would be the <br />ideal situation. However, he said he was open to other <br />suggestions and would be willing to bring back another proposal. <br />• Councilmember Callahan suggested that the motion be withdrawn. It <br />was his understanding that he was seconding the establishment of <br />a third lieutenant position, not the expenditure of $50,000.00. <br />Mayor Grabek withdrew his motion, Councilmember Callahan withdrew <br />his second. <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember <br />Callahan, to accept the concept of a three lieutenant <br />(supervisory) position. He requested that the Chief bring back a <br />proposal, alternatives and recommendations to achieve that. <br />Motion, Ayes =5, Nays =O, Motion passed. <br />SEPTIC LICENSE- INGLESIDE ENGINEERING <br />RECON11ENDATION OF DENIAL <br />City Administrator Bernhardson stated this item was for a <br />specific denial of a septic system installer's license. This is <br />a request for an automatic denial because applicant falsified <br />information on the application. Additionally, there has been <br />questions concerning the quality of work performed by Ingleside. <br />Due to the fact that Ingleside had not had an opportunity to <br />respond to the City, Bernhardson said that the Council may wish <br />to table this item. <br />Mayor Grabek questioned whether the falsification of <br />infomation had been verified? Assistant Planning and Zoning <br />Administrator Gaffron replied that the Minutes of the City of <br />• Independence Council Meeting had been obtained. <br />City Attorney Barrett suggested that Ingleside be given an <br />opportunity to appear before the Council and offer any <br />15 <br />