Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 13, 1989 <br />ZONING FILE #1366- BUTTERFIELD CONTINUED • <br />and does have vehicular access over the Luce Line. Outlot A <br />contains wetlands and there is a total of 2 1/2 acres of dry land <br />both north and south of the Luce Line. The Planning Commission <br />recommended that no structures be allowed south of the Luce Line <br />and that there be a 100' setback from the Luce Line right -of -way. <br />Mr. Butterfield was requesting that the pond in Lot 1 be excluded <br />from the conservation and flowage easement. <br />Mr. Butterfield was present and explained that he built the <br />pond in 1953 for the purposes of irregation and drainage. When <br />full, the pond will hold 1,100,000 gallons. <br />Acting Mayor Callahan stated that in his opinion the entire <br />application should be tabled due to the need to review the <br />conservation and flowage easement issue. Councilmember Goetten <br />concurred. <br />It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by <br />Councilmember Goetten, to table this item until the February 27, <br />1989 Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes =4, Nays =O, Motion passed. <br />ENGINEER'S REPORT: <br />1989 ENGINEERING RATES <br />Councilmember Peterson inquired as to whether the proposed • <br />engineering rates would be comparable to rates charged to other <br />communities. City Administrator Bernhardson said that having not <br />done a recent rate review he could not specifically answer that <br />question. Previous rates charged by Bonestroo have been <br />comparable. City Engineer Cook informed the Council that the <br />rates were in line with rates charged to other clients; Bonestroo <br />tried to be consistent and competitive, and in some cases, <br />charged a lower rate /hour than other firms. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Peterson, seconded by <br />Councilmember Nettles, to approve the proposed 1989 rates as an <br />amendment to the contract with Bonestroo and Associates for <br />engineering services. Motion, Ayes =4, Nays =O, Motion passed. <br />MAYOR' S REPORT: <br />There was no report from the Mayor. <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />COUNTY ROAD 51 PARKING <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained that due to the <br />late arrival of information from Hennepin County, he was unable <br />to arrange to have residents in the area present. Hennepin <br />County is now proposing a fourth alternative to address the sight <br />distance problem. The new proposal would involve removal of 4 <br />parking slots along the bend in County Road 51 between the <br />Hendrickson Bridge to Baldur Park Road. It is Bernhardson's <br />intention to have the residents present and discuss this proposal <br />at the February 27, 1989 Council Meeting. <br />6 <br />