My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-23-1989 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
01-23-1989 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2012 11:35:09 AM
Creation date
9/5/2012 11:35:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 23, 1989 <br />• 1989 APPOINTMENTS CONTINUED <br />Peterson, Goetten and Nettles agreed. <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />MARINA LICENSING PROCESS - 1989 <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron <br />explained that there were three issues involved with this matter. <br />Should there be a Marina Committee; should the City continue to <br />license marinas (Orono's codes require licensing to occur); and <br />whether marinas should be an allowed use in the B2 zone or should <br />they be a conditional use. When this third issue was previously <br />raised, it was met with opposition from the marina owners. The <br />owners felt they were losing some degree of security in their <br />business by changing marinas from an allowed use to a conditional <br />use. <br />The City Staff believes that past marina committees have <br />dealt with specific issues, but have not had the authority to <br />negotiate with the marinas as they were not established as a <br />legitimate body within the code. They were not effective in <br />dealing with the issues. It is also Staff's opinion that the <br />licensing process has not been very effective in that marinas <br />have been allowed to operate without a license. If the Council <br />feels that there should be a marina committee, Staff would <br />•request that the committee be created by resolution and be given <br />some specific authority and direction as to their goals and <br />intent. <br />There are three factors that support discontinuation of <br />licensing: <br />1. The City has limited jurisdiction over dock use areas, <br />layouts, number of slips and dredging. The City's main <br />jurisdiction lies in land use controls. <br />2. Marina licensing duplicates existing regulations. <br />Anytime a marina requests a change in land use, or its operation, <br />a land use application is normally required. <br />3. Denial of licenses has not been an effective reprimand. <br />The lack of a license has not stopped marinas from operating or <br />selling their business. At this time, licensing represents <br />little more than a paper work process. <br />Councilmember Goetten stated that the licensing was the only <br />control the City has had. She agreed with Gaffron that the <br />marina committee was only a recommending body with less authority <br />than the Planning Commission. She suggested that perhaps the <br />authority given to the marina committee needs to be enlarged. <br />Goetten felt that the City should have a number of subcommittees <br />•addressing concerns such as marinas, shoreline regulations, etc. <br />She felt that if the committee had some authority it could assist <br />the Zoning Department. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.