My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-28-1988 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
11-28-1988 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2012 4:44:44 PM
Creation date
8/27/2012 4:44:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L � <br />• MINUTES OF REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 28,1988 <br />ZONING FILE #1334- REBERS CONTINUED <br />looked at before plans were wmade to upgrade Brown Road. <br />Councilmember Callahan pointed out the fact that the upgrading of <br />Brown Road' was included in a proposal to upgrade all of the <br />M.S.A. roads within Orono. He said the Rebers subdivision and <br />the issue of sewer have nothing to do with upgrading Brown Road. <br />Mr. Johnson asked Callahan as to his opinion regarding the <br />proposed subdivision. Callahan replied that he thought the plan <br />to be a good one, and had no objections to the 6 lots along the <br />northern boundary. <br />Mr. Brachman believed that the initial proposal called for 1• <br />acre lots at a minimum. However, there are now lots proposed to <br />be 3/4's of an acre.- It bothered him that the plan had varied. <br />He compared the density to Ferndale North, and added that he did <br />not move to Orono to look at that. Mayor Grabek said that the <br />lots could be 1 acre but it would eliminate the buffer. <br />Mr. Duncanson suggested that since there seemed to be enough <br />public dissatisfaction with the development, that perhaps the <br />application should be returned to the Planning Commission._ Mayor <br />Grabek stated that he understood the residents' unhappiness. He <br />said that there was always dissatisfaction of neighbors with <br />improvements. He assured the neighbors that he and the Council <br />were doing their best to properly develop the land within Orono. <br />He said there were two sides to this issue. Mrs. Duncanson <br />stated that the majority of the citizens of Orono were against <br />the 1 acre zoning. She did not understand how the Council could <br />claim to represent the citizens of Orono. The question arose as <br />to whether Mr. Rebers intended to reside within the subdivision <br />and whether he was even a citizen of Orono. Mr. Beach stated <br />that this proposal was changing the zoning of the City that <br />attracted everyone to Orono. It will alleviate the country <br />flavor of Orono. <br />Mayor Grabek explained that changes had been occurring over <br />the last 2 -1/2 years with the Highway 12 Corridor study. It was <br />felt that this type of` zoning would provide a suitable buffer to <br />the commercial atmosphere of Highway 12. He further added that <br />there were 9 public hearings involving this matter. <br />Mr. Fordyce reiterated previously expressed feelings that <br />the Council was not representing the citizens as a whole, but <br />merely one individual. <br />Councilmember Goetten stated that the Mayor had asked for <br />the public to express their concerns. The Council had not yet <br />expressed their concerns or asked their questions. She added <br />that the rezoning had already occurred, but that did not mean <br />that other concerns could not be addressed. Mr. Platteter said <br />•that even though there were objections to the rezoning, it <br />marched ahead. He asked why the access road could not be located <br />off of the proposed frontage road? <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.