Laserfiche WebLink
• MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL-MEETING OF OCTOBER 10, 1988 <br />ZONING FILE #1333 SIDNEY REBERS CONTINUED <br />could be voted upon and put aside it would help keep the process <br />moving. 1 <br />It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by <br />Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2525. Motion, <br />Ayes =4, Nays =O, Motion passed. <br />#1338 DUANE & CONNIE SCHIBILLA <br />3235 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD <br />VARIANCES <br />RESOLUTION #2517 <br />The applicants were present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this <br />application involved a request to construct a 241x 26' two - story, <br />two -car garage. This garage would replace a previous garage that <br />was destroyed in the July 1987 "Super Storm ". The main issue <br />involved with this matter is whether a 33' easement in favor of <br />the City of Orono exists on the property. Assistant Planning and <br />Zoning Administrator Gaffron added that the Schibil la's attorney <br />is working to find out whether the easement is a mistake. The <br />City Attorney has examined the records for this property and has <br />determined that the easement could be a mistake. If the <br />Schibilla's attorney determines that the easement exists, the <br />Schibillas would need to go through a Proceeding Subsequent to <br />remove the easement from title. At that time, the City would <br />need to determine whether they were interested in maintaining the <br />easement or if they would prefer to vacate it. The issues <br />regarding the size of the proposed garage and the hardcover still <br />need to be addressed. The staff's recommendations are that any <br />action to approve this application be conditioned upon deferring <br />issuance of a building permit until the easement matter is <br />resolved. <br />Mr. Schibilla stated that it was highly questionable whether <br />the easement exists. He has seen surveys and legal descriptions <br />of adjacent property and the easement does not exist on those <br />properties. Originally, the applicants' property, was two <br />separate parcels. On one description, the easement is indicated, <br />on the second parcel, there is language that allows for the right <br />to create an easement. If the City does have an easement, Mr. <br />Schibilla believed it would only be 33' x 151. The City will <br />have to decide whether or not they want the easement. He wanted <br />the Council to decide that issue immediately so he could commence <br />with the construction of the garage. If there is an easement, <br />and the City decides it does not want to vacate it, Mr. Schibilla <br />would not have another location for his garage. All of the <br />neighboring properties have garages that are located in such a <br />• way that they too would be on the 33' easement. <br />Mayor Grabek asked about the ramifications allowing Mr. <br />Schibilla to build if in fact the easement did exist. Gaffron <br />18 <br />