My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-12-1988 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
09-12-1988 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2012 4:41:00 PM
Creation date
8/27/2012 4:41:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 <br />• ZONING FILE #1316 -BARR CONTINUED <br />garage to the existing garage: Mr. Barr explained that the <br />existing garage is nearly 1,000 s.f. Attaching another structure <br />to it would put him over the maximum 1,000 s.f. floor area <br />requirement. He preferred to construct the additional garage in <br />this fashion because it would be the least obtrusive. <br />Councilmember Callahan stated that he would be inclined to <br />agree with the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial. <br />He can see no hardship in this matter. The applicant's lot is <br />very limited. If Mr. Barr made revisions to his plan that would <br />not require variances, that would be fine. However, he would not <br />approve any other plan. Councilmember Peterson asked Gaffron <br />what size limitations the applicant could meet without the need <br />for variances. The current code allows multiple accessory <br />structures as long as they are detached. Mr. Barr could have as <br />many 1,000 s.f. buildings as long as hardcover area limitations <br />are adhered to. The location of the structure and how much <br />driveway would be needed to access it will determine the maximum <br />size the building can be to conform to an existing or decreased <br />level of hardcover. <br />There was a brief discussion pertaining to areas above <br />garage structures and the potential for them to be turned into. <br />• living space. City Administrator Bernhardson suggested that the <br />Council return this matter to the Planning Commission. It would <br />be necessary for them to review this application since Mr. Barr <br />had deviated from his original plans. Also, there would need to <br />be a review for the possibility of an after - the -fact conditional <br />use permit for the area being occupied above the existing garage. <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that <br />whether the applicant needed variance approval for his proposed <br />construction, he would still need to apply for a separate <br />conditional use permit for the dwelling above the existing <br />garage. In light of that, this matter would have to be reviewed <br />by the Planning Commission. <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember <br />Callahan, to refer this matter back to the Planning Commission to <br />address the revised plan and the after - the -fact conditional use <br />permit. Motion, Ayes =5, Nays =O, Motion passed. <br />#1320 DR. AND MRS. BRANDENBURG <br />719 MINNETONKA HIGHLANDS LANE <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #2494 <br />The applicants were not present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson apprised the Council that the <br />applicants were seeking hardcover variances to reconstruct a <br />• screen porch and existing deck on the lake side of their home. <br />Currently there is 31.8% hardcover in the 75- 2501zone and would <br />require an average lakeshore setback variance. Assistant <br />W <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.