Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 <br />• ZONING FILE #1303- REZABER CONTINUED <br />indeed there are new property owners, the City would ask them to <br />attend the Council Meeting so their intentions regarding the <br />fence could be determined. If it is their desire to reinstall <br />the fence, the Council could proceed as planned, otherwise the <br />matter would be dismissed. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by <br />Councilmember Nettles, to table this matter. until the September <br />26, 1988 Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes =4, Nayes =0, Motion <br />passed. <br />#1311 JOHN PURDY <br />1975 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD, <br />VARIANCE <br />City Administrator Bernhardson advised the Council that the: <br />Purdys were asking to renew and revise variances granted in 1985. <br />The Purdys were seeking approval to construct an addition <br />consisting of a 3- season porch and bathroom. They would require <br />lakeshore setback, average lakeshore setback and hardcover <br />variances. <br />Mr. Purdy made reference toga written statement that.was <br />included in the information given!to the Councilmembers. He did <br />• not agree with the Planning Commisi sion's findings and asked the <br />Council to reconsider their proposal. Applicant stated that <br />their hardship was that the house was built 80 years ago and only <br />has a bath and a half. Mr. Purdy did not f eel that their <br />proposal was obtrusive to any of their neighbors and the addition <br />would not be visible from the lake. There would be no drainage <br />problem created by their proposed addition. <br />1 <br />Councilmember Goetten stated that she would look at this <br />application more favorably if it were for a bathroom only. She <br />did not 'feel that a 3- season porch was a necessity. She also <br />questioned the feasibility of putting the addition on the kitchen <br />side of the house. She stated that she would have a difficult <br />time approving the addition because it would be in the 0 -75' <br />zone. t <br />Mr. Purdy replied that the proposed location of the bathroom <br />was the most sensible and accessible. The remodeling and <br />addition they did in 1985 eliminated the screen porch they had. <br />They now find that they miss the porch and wish to build one that <br />would allow them a view of Lake Minnetonka. Placing the addition <br />where they currently propose would eliminate the need to make any <br />new accesses. In terms of minimumicosts, their present proposal <br />is the most economical. Councilmember Goetten inquired as to the <br />location of the previous screen porch. Assistant Planning and <br />zoning Administrator Gaff ron indicated that the porch had been <br />• located on the street side of the House. <br />Mr. Purdy also volunteered to remove hardcover in the form <br />3 <br />