Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 <br />ZONING FILE #1275 - DOUGLAS JOHNSON CONTINUED • <br />Councilmember.Goetten asked Assistant Planning and Zoning <br />Administrator Gaffron if. moving the house would impinge upon the <br />lift station. Gaffron stated that the lift station would have to <br />be replaced if the house were moved over. However, an <br />examination of the lift station indicated that the current <br />proposed location of the house would still allow access to the <br />lift station. A portion of it would be under the line of the <br />house. Applicant stated that he planned the design of the house <br />with the lift station in mind. He did not know how large the <br />cavity was. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson asked Mr. Johnson if he would <br />have gone ahead with this project if a determination was made <br />from the onset that the entire foundation would require removal? <br />Mr. Johnson stated that it would have changed his thinking as to <br />the design of the house. He added that the farther back on the <br />lot the house is placed, the more of an incline there would be to <br />contend with. Councilmember Callahan surmized that the Johnson's <br />neighbors chose to build their homes up on top of the hill, <br />farther from the lake. If the Council were to insist upon the <br />average lakeshore setback being met, the house would have to be <br />built up on the hill. Mr. Johnson concurred and added that he <br />could not use the existing house plan. He has already obtained a <br />mortgage based upon the existing plan. • <br />Mayor Grabek stated that he could not look at this matter in <br />any other light than what had previously been agreed upon. It was <br />moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that <br />since the entire structure has been removed in order to meet <br />Minnesota Building Codes, that the new structure be located so as <br />to meet the setback requirements. Applicant asked for <br />clarification that if he met the setbacks he could build the <br />house as is? City Adminstrator Bernhardson stated that an <br />average setback variance would still be required. Assistant <br />Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron reported that the <br />Building Inspector suggested some minor revisions to the proposed <br />plan in light of relocating the house to meet the setbacks. <br />Mayor Grabek reiterated what the motion entailed. Gaffron asked <br />if the deck would need to meet the 0 -75' setback. The Council <br />answered affirmatively. Gaffron acknowledged that the average <br />lakeshore setback variance would still be granted.- Councilmember <br />Peterson questioned the height variance. Gaffron stated that the <br />height variance would still be granted because there would be no <br />change in the height. Motion, Ayes =5, Nays =O, Motion passed. <br />ENGINEERS REPORT: <br />WILLOW DRIVE AND HIGHWAY 12 FLASHER* <br />It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by <br />Councilmember Peterson, to approve the maintenance agreement with • <br />the Minnesota Department of Transportation for the flasher- light <br />at Willow Drive and Highway 12, and to bill Long Lake 50% of the <br />14 <br />