My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-25-1988 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
07-25-1988 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2012 4:26:38 PM
Creation date
8/27/2012 4:26:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 25, 1988 <br />#1291 ALFRED IVERSON - CONTINUED <br />leading to the tennis courts. <br />Ms. Iverson confirmed that all they required was a small backing -up <br />area so they would not have to back all the way down the driveway. <br />Callahan stated that the current plans seemed to be in accordance with what <br />the Applicant was seeking and questioned why there was so much confusion <br />about, approving this hardcover variance. Zoning Administrator Mabusth <br />stated that originally the Iversons were requesting an increase in the <br />hardcover and the Planning Commission decided that the Iversons could not <br />exceed the 38.4% coverage. Callahan asked why the issue of safety as it <br />pertains.to.the driveway was not discussed. Mabusth replied that that. <br />issue• was- never raised by the Applicants or their contractor. <br />Councilmember Goetten asked if removing the landscaping plastic and pathway <br />would equal the hardcover addition of the turn - around. Mabusth stated that <br />she could not answer that question since the square footage of the <br />landscaping plastic was unknown. It was determined through further <br />discussion that the 38.4% calculation is not accurate. <br />Councilmember Callahan stated that timing is a factor -for the Iversons <br />because they would like to have the building completed in time for their <br />children to begin school in the fall. He would like to see some decision <br />•made, either to hold the Iverson's at 38.4% or give them some extra leeway <br />and limit them to 39 %. However, there was not enough information provided <br />regarding the driveway to make an accurate calculation. Councilmember <br />Goetten stated that if a percentage was approved at least it might resolve <br />the situation, as opposed to tabling the matter and putting it off another <br />two weeks. Mabusth suggested that the contractor file his plans and start <br />the building permit application process. <br />It was moved. by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to <br />table this matter. He explained to Ms. Iverson that it was very important <br />for the contractor to get the plans in and the building permit application <br />filled out. If he failed to do so immediately, this matter would not be on <br />the agenda for the August 8th Council Meeting. The Mayor went on to say <br />that the Iversons could expect that the Council will approve the variance, <br />but they will need to fine tune the conditions. Ms. Iverson inquired <br />whether the contractor should measure the landscaping around the house. <br />Mabusth stated that the Council is going to have to have that measurement <br />to make their final decision. The contractor explained that they do not <br />file the building plans until the lot is staked out. They do not stake out <br />the lot until everything has been approved. The Mayor explained that the <br />Council needs to know what the contractor is planning before the variance <br />is approved. They cannot run the risk of approving plans now and then <br />having the contractor vary those plans so that the overall amount of <br />hardcover changes. The contractor stated that it is too costly for them to <br />apply for the permit without the, consent of the plans. He asked why he was <br />not informed that there was a problem with the hardcover. Councilmember <br />.Callahan explained that the problem arose following his discussion with Mr. <br />Iverson the preceding day. The contractor pointed out that the turn - around <br />is drawn on the original plans. It was Callahan's impression that Mr. <br />Iverson wanted more turn - around area than what was presently being <br />proposed. Mabusth added that there is additional hardcover that does not <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.