Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
• <br />;Y <br />i <br />a . <br />K <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 11, 1988 <br />Mayor Grabek suggested that more research be done on the 0' -75' so <br />that there will be no loopholes. Motion made that item #1296 be <br />tabled until appropriate wording can be established to state a <br />denial to protect the intent of the City Code and Ordinances. <br />Callahan interjected that it is clear that they can and must deny <br />the lot area application. It seems to him that the Council could <br />conceptually turn down the accessory dock on the property leaving <br />it to the City Attorney to further advise the Council as to <br />whether or not they would be prohibited from doing such a thing, <br />even if they wanted to. He suggests that in light of fact that he <br />is not in favor of issue, that the matter be denied rather than <br />.tabled... Mayor Grabek said he had no problem with this but wanted <br />to find out if the additional time for research was needed by <br />counsel. Attorney Barrett stated that he could not give a <br />conclusion at the moment, but wouldn't advise that there is a <br />difficulty with denying the lot area application upon the staff's <br />recommendat-ions or the point. disussed . at tonight's :meeting. <br />Callahan stated that because they do not have a specific <br />resolution here, either on the basis of the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation or otherwise, the staff is suggesting that the <br />Council give them conceptual direction. The Mayor said he had no <br />problem with that and withdrew his motion. It was moved by <br />Councilmember CaLlahan, seconded by Mayor Grabek that Council deny <br />the lot area. application of Rick Sto.dola and Merrit Peterson and <br />deny application for an accessory dock on the basis of the <br />Planning Commission's recommendation and findings and that Council <br />direct the staff to prepare a resolution enbodying those concepts <br />and request that the City Attorney advise the Council as to the <br />status of the use. Motion, Ayes -4, Nays -O, motion passed. <br />#1299 NANCY HIGGINS <br />3017 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />RESOLUTION #2468 <br />Applicant Higgins was present. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this is a request <br />for a Conditional Use Permit on a property that currently has a <br />principal structure, a guest house and a caretaker structure. At... <br />one time these were two separate lots. The applicant seeks a <br />Conditional Use Permit issued in advance of removal and new <br />construction of the principal structure. The guest house does not <br />have heating and cooling and is being used as a guest house only. <br />The one issue, and the staff recommends that the proposed <br />resolution be amended to include putting the applicant on notice <br />there is a screened porch in the 0 -75 and language should be <br />included that applicant cannot repair or replace that structure.. <br />The Mayor asked for any comments from the applicant. Applicant <br />indicated that they are going to put the house further to the <br />east, as suggested, in case someone wants to subdivide in the <br />future, they will then have one acre. The Mayor asked about <br />• subdivision. Zoning Administrator explained that applicant <br />6 <br />