My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-1988 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
07-11-1988 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2012 4:26:08 PM
Creation date
8/27/2012 4:26:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO I COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 11, 1988 <br />asked her what the possibility would be of dock usage in the area. <br />He said that her comment to him was that the question at hand was <br />whether or not the lot was buildable. It was obvious that a 5,000 <br />sq. ft. lot is unbuildable, so it was suggested the applicants go <br />before the Council to see what could be done with this lot. Mr. <br />Michaels referred to the comments regarding the dock as an <br />accessory structure and does not see anywhere in the Ordinance <br />where a dock is referred to as an accessory structure. He went on <br />to confirm the location of the property in question as being a <br />channel near Lord Fletcher's that abuts County Road 19. He <br />addressed the recomendations made by staff: <br />There is no question that there is approximately 5,500 sq. ft. of <br />area, or that the area i.s inadequate to build a home and that it <br />has never been assessed for sewer and water. The tax valuation is <br />nominal:: He cannot disagree that:' the: -lot is subject toy flooding <br />but there have been no findings or evidence or expert testimony <br />that there has been any flooding. There is no question that the <br />lot i•s substandard. He finds it difficult to believe that a dock <br />would create any problems with surface water Drainage. Congestion <br />in the area should not be the result of maintaining a one or two <br />slip dock. Referred to the finding of dimunition of value to <br />surrounding properties as a bunch of nonsense. With regard to the <br />.problem of parking in the area he suggests that the issuance of a <br />dock permit for one or two boats should not create parking <br />problems in the area. <br />• Mr. Michals responded to Finding #8, referring to hardship by <br />stating that the Applicants cannot build a house or any structures <br />and the only thing they can use the property for is a dock: He <br />does not see how the granting of a dock permit would be adverse to <br />the health, safety and welfare of the City of Orono. He <br />respecful ly requested that a permit be issued for the dock for at <br />least one or two boats. <br />Mayor Grabek asked for any questions on the part of the Council or <br />the staff. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated to Council that <br />the findings noted by Michals dealt with the development of the <br />property as a building site and had nothing to do with <br />the installation of a residential. dock. That they first had to <br />deny the fact that it was a buildable lot and those were the staff <br />findings for building on this lot, not having a dock structure on <br />this lot. Mr. Michals stated that his clients never asked to put <br />a building on the lot. Mabusth noted that the first thing to be <br />determined is the buildability of the parcel before the City can <br />deal with accessory structures. Councilmember Goetter stated that <br />she has never seen an incident where a dock was approved for <br />building on a parcel without a structure and is afraid that a <br />precedent would be set. <br />Mr. Michals addressed the Mayor and mentioned that it was his <br />understanding that his clients do have a dredging permit from the <br />LMCD and that his clients could -go ahead and install a seawall to <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.