My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-1988 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
05-09-1988 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2012 4:43:58 PM
Creation date
8/21/2012 4:43:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 9, 1988 <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS CONTINUED <br />In reference to a report that the Orono Police are <br />investigating the shooting of a dog, Mr. Hollander felt <br />that the Police Dept. has not followed up on his missing <br />cat which he believes his neighbors are involved in. <br />Mayor Grabek directed Chief Kilbo to provide a written <br />response to Mr. Hollander on this matter. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />#1129 TODD WATERS <br />306.1 CASCO POINT ROAD <br />FINAL SITE PLAN <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the status of <br />the required restoration of the lakeshore property at <br />3061 Casco Point Road. Applicant has submitted a final <br />restoration site plan per Council direction , however <br />applicant requests reconsideration by Council regarding <br />the fill adjacent to the house. He noted that the storm <br />sewer study project is pending a signed agreement <br />from the applicant regarding the costs of the study, <br />which is anticipated to be resolved in the next few <br />• days. <br />Todd Waters was present for this matter and explained <br />proposed final site plan. He noted the proposed <br />hardcover trade -off of a pre- existing double retaining <br />wall (which served as a window box) into two separate <br />retaining walls, one of which in a different location. <br />Regarding the fill adjacent to the house, if this is <br />required the house would need to be raised 4 -6" which <br />may cause structural damage to the house, therefore, <br />asks for reconsideration of requiring the fill and <br />approval of the alternative site plan as proposed. <br />City Engineer Cook concurred that placing the fill <br />adjacent to the house would require the house to be <br />raised in order to put in the concrete wall, which <br />presents the potential for structural damage to the <br />house. <br />Councilmember Goetten asked City Engineer Cook when the <br />storm sewer study will be done, and voiced concern on <br />how the applicants proposed amendment, `if approved, <br />would impact the drainage in the study. <br />City Engineer Cook stated that the study should be <br />completed in two weeks. He stated to some extent the <br />• proposal will impact the drainage. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.